[Law is not justice but process]

No way that is the same signature as the CBS documents. The dissimilarities are numerous, but the most telling to me is the pen stroke at the top leg of the K goes up in one and down in the other. One or the other is a forgery.

The discharge request you linked to LOOKS like a 1972 military document. It is courier font with uniform character width and no fancy superscripts on the 111th. My money is on the Discharge Request being genuine and the CBS documents being forgeries.

(Fellow FReepers, please forgive me for getting so engrossed in this. I am a prosecutor and often get to deal with questionable documents. It just fascinates me)

My conclusion (then I must get some sleep as I have court in the morning):

The CBS documents are forgeries. There is an unexplainable superscript in the May 4th memo. The signatures do not match the Bush discharge request. The type font is proportional and not the nearly universal courier. The content is too modeled to the needs of 2004 Bush Bashers. The only witnesses named in the memo are dead. These are the best reasons I see. Please correct me if I have omitted anything.

[razorback-bert]

I just drove home and haven't seen the memo's, but two things jump out at me and I think they fit into your list, which I agree with.

No corrections and they appear to be proofread.

Everyone of us on this forum has expienced those problems along with spelliing errors.