Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buckhead; Dark Wing
My wife says she used an IBM "ball" typewriter with a porportionately spaced font in 1971, and that it wasn't much good at it. She also says that none of the "ball" typewriters she ever used had special characters such as the "th" for use in "#th".

She says the "ball" typewriters of this period were huge, heavy, and confined to the desks of secretaries who typed constantly. It is unlikely that the Texas National Guard had any during this period.

IMO the proportionately spaced fonts of "ball" typewriters of this period would be distinctive, and easily distinguished from those produced by later specialized word-processors, and modern computers.

65 posted on 09/09/2004 9:29:10 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Thud
She also says that none of the "ball" typewriters she ever used had special characters such as the "th" for use in "#th"".

And she's absolutely correct.

Signed,
DOE, Former NYC Publications Typesetter, 1982-1988

164 posted on 09/10/2004 7:43:28 PM PDT by DaughterofEve (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson