Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy
When I think of the way the old Bullseye shop was laid out it could amount to negligence in that it made the theft too easy. It was narrow, often crowded and had many guns accessible that weren't within view of the sales desk. Any one could walk in grab a rifle without the staff noticing and then stick it under a long coat and walk out.
17 posted on 09/08/2004 8:03:13 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Libertarianize the GOP

Bullseye, yes, but Bushmaster, no. Whether Bullseye complies with the law and good business practices is not Bushmaster's job to determine, it is the BATFE's. Why should a manufacturer be liable for criminal misuse of its products? If anyone should be held accountable for the fact that the rifle, and many others, went unnoticed when they went missing from Bullseye, it should be the BATFE, whose (unconstitutional) charter includes ensuring that gun sellers comply with storage and notification laws.


35 posted on 09/08/2004 8:58:06 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson