[My2Cents]

I would think SF would be somewhere near the bottom, if one is looking to date someone of the opposite gender.

("SF...somewhere near the bottom..." No pun intended.)

[MNlurker]

Sounds about right for Minneapolis. Still single, but fortunate that I basically fell into a large group of friends by chance. Especially since I work from home!


I would hate to be single and move here (Like I did) because this town is definately cliqueish

[BossLady]

I can't believe Reno, NV is not on this list!!! LOL!

I bet it would be for singles over 30!!

[GOP_1900AD]

But given the large number of "new grad" type jobs here, it makes for a fairly active scene. One thing to note, which distorts this study, San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland are a single contiguous mass of concrete, saddling San Francisco Bay. So, for example, a person sitting in San Francisco or the suburbs near it will just as likely be dating someone in what they call "Oakland" or "San Jose." Back when I was of that age I quite literally lived in all three, depending on where I had my place at the time, and dated in all three. Strange that the number for "Oakland" is out of whack with "San Francisco" and "San Jose" (note these last two being nearly identical) - it sort of makes me suspect the whole thing.

[albee]

"...I would think SF would be somewhere near the bottom, if one is looking to date someone of the opposite gender."

True, but look at the positve side of your equation. If you are bi-sexual, you double your chance to score on a Saturday Night!