Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pilsner

----Presidential elector is a Federal office. There is ZERO chance that the U.S. Supreme Court would uphold a STATE law that strips an elected FEDERAL officer holder of his or her discretion.----

The Constitution doesn't require electors to vote a certain way, that's true. However, it does not revoke the states' discretion to require its electors to obey the outcome of elections.

-Dan
103 posted on 09/08/2004 2:26:41 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor (ZELL MILLER IN '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Flux Capacitor
Imagine if a State passed a law that said that a Congresscritter could not switch parties, and that he had to vote for the nomineee of his parties caucus for Speaker / Majority Leader. Would that be upheld? No. what is the difference? What's more, the whole purpose of the Electoral College is to isolate the selection of the President from the popular vote.
107 posted on 09/08/2004 2:51:18 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson