I assume, and I bet Bush is willing to stipulate, that 68Kerry would have been a superior President to 68Bush.
BUT IT'S NOT 1968 ANYMORE.
In the thirty-six years SINCE 1968, Kerry has shown us what kind of a President he would be, and so has Bush.
The choice is clear.
Don't live in the past.
I hope that someone on this board is working for the President. Because what you just said is what he should be saying at the first debate. It would de-tooth that traitor J F'in Kerry right quickly.
BUMP to you!
I disagree with your premise based on the following:
NEVER trust anyone who is so desparate to become President that he creates his own presidential history! The '68 version of Kerry was just as %$#@ed up as the 2004 version.
Give me someone who respects the office and approaches the responsibilities humbly and reverently...and is dedicated to protecting the American people instead of advancing himself!