... we don't observe rocks turning into life. No one expects that to happen. Maybe a creationist does, but no biologist. What's your point> If rocks don't spring to life, as in the the tale of Jason and the Golden Fleece, then what -- Noah's Ark becomes the default "theory"?
I'm going to pause to recap some earlier points. In post 49, I pointed out the definition of a theory, to show that creationism doesn't qualify. You've pretty much ignored that (your post 53 was just tapdancing). Your claim in post 56 about rocks not springing to life is an absurdity. Do you imagine that you're refuting something in the theory of evolution? Until you seriously deal with some of the issues raised here, you don't really deserve much more attention. At least not from me.
Oh, welcome to free republic. How nice that you found a crevo thread on your very first day.