The second sentence is correct based on the observation of the complexity of life itself, suggesting a design, and the fact there are no observations of spontaneous creation of any forms, complex or simple.
And it is because of that very same scientifc method that evolution is not a law. The observations required to confirm its predictions are missing.
That pretty well blows creationism away, doesn't it?
So then life has always been the same from the time of creation until today? If that's the case, then why don't we find any fossils that appear to be modern cows, horses, people, etc.? If it's not true that life has been the same since the time of creation, then by definition life has evolved. Therefore the theory of evolution must be true (at least in its general principles, not necessarily in its details).