Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: orionblamblam

"And I'll note that you never once addressed my rather simple and complete trouncing of your notion that "without the Scriptures, Creationism is a non-issue."

That's because I agree with you. Given the wide scope this debate has taken, that argument was far too narrow.


"Now, are you going to actually try to debate, or are you going to continue being irrelevant?"

Intimidation. Good try. I don't scare easily. What's next? Are you going to "tell mommy" that I'm not being nice? (That's called "baiting")

And I'll note that you never once addressed my rather simple and complete trouncing of your methodologies. You only switch insults.


146 posted on 09/08/2004 6:50:44 AM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (Which part of "Don't Mess With Texas" didn't you get?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: Leapfrog

> That's because I agree with you.

Finally, some progress.

> I don't scare easily.

Nor do you debate. Divert, divert, divert...

> And I'll note that you never once addressed my rather simple and complete trouncing of your methodologies.

That's because my debating style is not the topic of debate.


147 posted on 09/08/2004 6:55:07 AM PDT by orionblamblam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson