To: gilliam
I would stay away from Ted Sampley if I were you.
He was behind attacks on John McCain in 2000, and these will be exposed if his ads achieve any prominence.
He could negate the SwiftVets in the public's mind.
19 posted on
09/06/2004 9:06:26 AM PDT by
sinkspur
("What's the point in being Pope if I can't wear the tiara?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
To: sinkspur
"I would stay away from Ted Sampley if I were you. "He was behind attacks on John McCain in 2000, and these will be exposed if his ads achieve any prominence."
And somehow this is bad? McCain is/was/always will be a fraud.
Tell ya what, Sink -- put on your feety-pajamas and hunker down in your basement.
We'll ping you after the election.
To: sinkspur
I thought Bush and Rove were behind those ads against mccain.
48 posted on
09/06/2004 9:29:53 AM PDT by
cksharks
To: sinkspur
I think his dispute with McCain is legitimate. I'm not saying he is correct, only that McCain's definition of a fringe vet, is any vet that is critical of McCain.
83 posted on
09/06/2004 5:36:05 PM PDT by
NavVet
(“Benedeict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
To: sinkspur
I agree. I just pulled out my "Stolen Valor" book and it indicats Sampley has made several million dollars selling tee shirts in front of the Vietnam Memorial Wall. Selling tee shirts in fron of The Wall?
I smell a Larry Klayman type.
Support John O'Neill (who is not making any money off his efforts) and the Swifties!
88 posted on
09/06/2004 5:48:18 PM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(If it's followers kill children it isn't a religion!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson