[Savage Rider]

I'm confused. Isn't it true that Bush's National Guard file is incomplete? I thought there were some missing pay records, or some records on old film that they were having trouble reconstructing.

[MEG33]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1200739/posts?page=5#5

A lot of good information found here.

[Robert A Cook PE]

And, if so, what does "difficult reconstructing" reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaly mean?

(It implies, DELIBERATELYY!) that "records are missing and THEREFORE BUSH DIDN'T SERVE IN VIETNAM (the lying traitorous, scheming, rich, AWOL, get-out-of-Vietnam-and-let-others-die) bastard! (because John Kerry served heroically in Vietnam didn't you know) .....)

But what does it really mean?

...

Nothing.

[the_Watchman]

I'm confused.

Don't be confused! Note that after Yahoo saw fit to leave an untrue headline up for a day which maligned Bush, then replace it with another headline which casts aspersions on Bush. Also note that there are no negative references to Kerry in said headlines.

Why are Bush records relevant while Kerry records are not? Why not have a headline about Kerry campaign shake-up? For months we were treated to headlines about Kerry leading Bush in Polls. Where are they?

I have noticed for a year that Yahoo's choice of headlines on Reuter's and AP stories seems quite biased. Of course, in the case of Reuters, they don't have much balance to choose from.