Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: POA2
And you keep thinking it is "how many they called" - They weighted it for a turn-out model that isn't close to any REAL turnout model....What don't you get about that??

Would you like the names and phone numbers? Or do you just not believe them? Well, you can deny the facts, but they're there. As for the number called, that was in fact your argument. See your own previous posts. And if you're arguing that they weighted the phone calls based on a model, that now tasks you with debunking that model. Your argument was that there was NO legitimate reason to weigh the phone calls, remember? Nice attempt to change the argument, but I'm not falling for it. Again, it is incumbent upon you to show:
Normalization was not used
AND/OR the normalization (in this case, the models to which you refer) was invalid.
Have at it, save the rant.
161 posted on 09/06/2004 11:04:48 AM PDT by ableChair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: ableChair
You've been proven a fool - Gallup numbers out - And they are EXACTLY where I said they would be - Between 5 and 7pts -....NOT 11pts - (too funny) -

But keep spinning that Newsweek polls are accurate - You are too much - Newsweek polls are JUNK - They are not done for accuracy they are done for news stories!! ( J.L.R - If you really know people in the bizz....you'll know who that is....and finally get a clue I know more about Newsweek then you ever will) -

But seriously, you are too funnny - (keep calling).

164 posted on 09/06/2004 6:14:54 PM PDT by POA2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson