Which I find rather strange, since Keyes has written extensively about how he doesn't consider Bush a fellow conservative either.
Keyes is a man who portrays himself as such a moral purist that he has the right to condemn anybody who dares to vary from his convictions one bit.
Yet he displays the same political pragmatism which you describe as "tact", during an election?
I describe that as amazing hypocrisy that makes him far less moral than anything he's accused Bush of.
Good job responding to my point, which was that Keyes has been fully behind the president since his reelection campaign began.