Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
Homosexuals will argue that a particular state recognizes heterosexual marriages from other states and will win on those grounds.

How can they be married in one state and then move to another and not be married? States rights work with many issues but not this one.

210 posted on 09/05/2004 3:24:21 PM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (Go George go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: TOUGH STOUGH
TOUGH STOUGH wrote:

Homosexuals will argue that a particular state recognizes heterosexual marriages from other states and will win on those grounds.

How can they? You previously claimed: " -- No one has ever interpreted a constitutional right for homosexuals to marry in this country, until now. -- " - You and your State do not have to accept that "new ruling". Prove it's a BS opinion.

How can they be married in one state and then move to another and not be married? States rights work with many issues but not this one.

So you ~now~ admit they have a right to marry? --- Which is it? -- Here are your previous words:

Homosexuals NEVER had the right to marry in this country, until now. It is you and people and activist judges like you who want to extend "rights" that just aren't there.
Therefore, a consitutional amendment, is very much in need.
191 posted on 09/05/2004 11:40:10 AM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH

220 posted on 09/05/2004 4:21:18 PM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson