Replies

We cannot allow further Amendments to our Constitution that infringe upon our individual rights.
Government has no business in dictating the terms of civil marriage between consenting adults.

Granted, our States can regulate the rules on 'uncivil marriages', [polygamy, incest, etc], -- using constitutional due process, but they can't 'ban' queers from calling themselves married, and from demanding equal tax & insurance treatment from government.

187 -tpaine-

_______________________________________________

TOUGH STOUGH wrote:
Now that activist judges in several states seem to have suddenly and incorrectly found a homosexual right to marriage and are attempting to foist homosexual marriage upon the nation, an amendment is a virtual necessity.

________________________________________________

So? -- Let the gay activists & judges "foist" their marriage claims. -- You say they have no rights on this issue? -- Ignore them. Refuse to recognize those claims in your State or County.

-- No amendment necessary.

197 tpaine

____________________________________________________

ET writes:
Naive at best.

-199-

_________________________________________________

Naive? How so?
--- States are not required to recognize the unconstitutional acts of other States, or of the federal government.

Surely, -- you can agree with me on that point?