Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
LOL! I am crying bucket loads of tears after reading THAT one. Homosexuals are so terribly REPRESSED and OPPRESSED. Your positions are ridiculous.

What about people who never marry and live with other family members or friends all their lives and thus pay higher taxes? Is the tax structure fair to them?

189 posted on 09/05/2004 10:56:07 AM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (Go George go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: TOUGH STOUGH
TOUGH STOUGH wrote: Homosexuals in this country are not oppressed, repressed or any other kind of 'pressed. I am sick and tired of arguments to the contrary. They can live together, have sex with one another (no one's peekin' in their bedrooms), acquire property, work, vacation etc (and do). They have legal means to assure the distribution of their property, or handling of their estate upon death and can even author living wills which will give their partners the same rights to make decisions regarding their health during illness and death as married spouses have.

_____________________________________


Tax Reduction for Homosexuals Denied Rights and Benefits by Government Petition
Address:http://www.petitiononline.com/LGTaxes/petition.html Changed:3:16 PM on Tuesday, March 23, 2004

Did you even bother to read the above, Tough?
Can you refute their claims?


______________________________________


Tough:
The legal definition of marriage should not be changed to accommodate their desires. We have seen what happens to the family and how it is further destroyed, when the definition of marriage is changed to permit homosexual marriage in places like Sweden for instance.
We all must stand firmly against the changing of the legal definition of marriage, to include homosexual marriage or any other kind of marital arrangement other than one man or one woman. We cannot allow homosexuals or any other group to hurt traditional marriage and traditional values any further.


______________________________________



We cannot allow further Amendments to our Constitution that infringe upon our individual rights.
Government has no business in dictating the terms of civil marriage between consenting adults.
Granted, our States can regulate the rules on 'uncivil marriages', [polygamy, incest, etc], -- using constitutional due process, but they can't 'ban' queers from calling themselves married, and from demanding equal tax & insurance treatment from government.
-187-

______________________________________


How is this an infringement upon gay rights? As I said and I'll repeat, "homosexuals have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex just like the rest of us."


LOL! I am crying bucket loads of tears after reading THAT one. Homosexuals are so terribly REPRESSED and OPPRESSED. Your positions are ridiculous.

What about people who never marry and live with other family members or friends all their lives and thus pay higher taxes?
Is the tax structure fair to them?
189

__________________________________________


No, the tax structure isn't 'fair', as we all know.
The solution? --- Amend the tax structure. The Republican supported 'Fair Tax' would work.

We don't need to amend the Constitution on marriage.
It is ~your~ positions on that, -- that are ridiculous.
190 posted on 09/05/2004 11:22:52 AM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson