Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lessismore
The Interstate legislation, as enacted in 1956…

Well, it’s probably nitpicking on my part, but I recall it was “The Interstate and Defense Highway Act” or something along those lines.

Not just for John Doe to cruise along for vacationing purposes, but a comprehensive interconnected highway system for transporting troops and equipment, should the need arise.

The states essentially gave up the right-of-way and the feds were to maintain them. No possibility for the state to collect tolls on the interstate system. That’s how it was intended and proposed, as I recall it.

9 posted on 09/04/2004 8:04:10 AM PDT by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Who dat?
I recall it was “The Interstate and Defense Highway Act” or something along those lines.

True, but was that anything other than the usual political ploy to associate pork barrel spending with a popular cause?

Large numbers of troops and heavy military equipment can be moved by rail, and were during World War II.

An actual invasion of the US by land forces was implausible, given the nuclear arsenal available. Following a nuclear exchange, the system would likely be unusable anyway.

13 posted on 09/04/2004 8:37:14 AM PDT by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson