And that article on abusive prison officials proves just what? Do you agree that prison officials should be abusive, or do you deny that abuse has ever occurred?
Neither.
The original article about the convention speech wasn't completely erronous. It just had the one comment in it which was completely and totally false, which indicates that the source of that comment, either the author, his source, or an editor, etc, inserted the fiction into the article in order to influence readers. That doesn't mean everything in the article is bogus.
This article and others posted here may have similar fictional insertions since it comes both from Hays and the AP.
The topic of the article I posted is not relevent.