Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Booing the AP(AP reporter ID'ed using Lexis-Nexis)
Galley Slaves blog ^ | Sept 3 2004 | Jonathan V. Last

Posted on 09/04/2004 5:36:40 AM PDT by Dog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-246 next last
To: Dallas59

Who said he hid it from his wife?


41 posted on 09/04/2004 5:54:36 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dog

BTTT


42 posted on 09/04/2004 5:54:38 AM PDT by kattracks (http://www.swiftvets.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog

You are Dog-Gone good, thanks


43 posted on 09/04/2004 5:54:55 AM PDT by apackof2 (Damn the torpedos! Full speed ahead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
It would seem them hired Michael Moore to write their wire copy.

Lie about the facts and then add critical commentary as well.

Bush did nothing to stop them???????????????????????

44 posted on 09/04/2004 5:55:10 AM PDT by OldFriend (WAR IS THE REMEDY OUR ENEMIES HAVE CHOSEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Cboldt I agree... AP needs to fess up to which reporter inserted that Booing quote...but for now we have Tom Hays listed as the byline reporter. Granted another reporter could have used his byline.

But what AP did here is the real story...

They sent out a LIE.....then scrubbed the internet of the orginial story and quote ......then removed the reporters byline......BUT forgot Lexis-Nexis saves everything and even includes a time stamp.

AP is the story..

45 posted on 09/04/2004 5:55:28 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
The name to remember is "Tom Hays".

And the organization to remember is "Associated Press".

46 posted on 09/04/2004 5:55:32 AM PDT by steveegg (John F'em Ke(rr)y - I was for the war in Iraq before I was against it before (too may flips to fit).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: apackof2

FWIW, I think folks should check their local papers if they get a chance to see if any ran with the discredited story today.


48 posted on 09/04/2004 5:56:26 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

On september 1, Tom Hays reported:

One woman held up a sign that read: "Republicans are really stupid. They watch Fox News and believe it."

She meant to say "Democrats read my articles and believe them."....
Further in the interview she said "Republicans are really smart . They don't believe anything that AP says."


49 posted on 09/04/2004 5:56:45 AM PDT by UltraKonservativen (( YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog

You Da Man.


51 posted on 09/04/2004 5:59:49 AM PDT by steveegg (John F'em Ke(rr)y - I was for the war in Iraq before I was against it before (too may flips to fit).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Why not blame all of the possible reporters and authors?

Because no else else is responsible for the words "Bush's audience of thousands in West Allis, Wisconsin, booed. Bush did nothing to stop them." Those words came from his own fingers.

I don't care if this guy is being paid money for his work, he's an AMATEUR. Only a hack would deliberately put such a kindergarten-pitched whine into the middle of a serious news story.

"Bush did nothing to stop them! Wah! Mommy!"

Let alone the structure of the first sentence, which leaves no conclusion other than that Bush's "audience of thousands" all rose to their feet and booed, like Yankee fans after a bad call by the ref. Never mind that audio, video, and eyewitness evidence shows that it simply didn't happen.

This guy needs to be fired. Let him go write for counterpunch or something.

52 posted on 09/04/2004 6:00:03 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Another work containing possible elements of fiction by Tom Hays - or his editor:

Gov't Report Backs Detainee Abuse Claims
By TOM HAYS
The Associated Press
Sunday, June 22, 2003; 4:13 PM

NEW YORK - Yasser Ebrahim says his introduction to the federal prison system came from guards slamming his head into a wall while calling him a "terrorist."

Shakir Baloch says guards at the same lockup warned him: "You will be here the rest of your life."

Those allegations and others - including random beatings - made by Muslim men held on immigration charges after the Sept. 11 attacks had been routinely dismissed by federal officials.

Earlier this month, however, the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General issued a report saying it found "significant problems" with the treatment of nearly 800 detainees nationwide, including abusive conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn where Ebrahim and Baloch were held.

The report cast a critical light on the little-known federal lockup on the waterfront, and breathed life into a pending civil rights lawsuit filed by Ebrahim, Baloch and five others against Attorney General John Ashcroft, prison personnel, FBI supervisors and other officials. The plaintiffs are seeking class action status.

"What we said about all the suffering was true," Ebrahim, 31, said in a phone interview from his native Egypt. "The government was doing its best to deny it."

Both Ebrahim and Baloch were held for eight months without being charged with a crime, then were deported.

"I'm owed an apology," said Baloch, 41, a Pakistani-born doctor with Canadian citizenship.

Their lawyers have amended the lawsuit, filed last year, to incorporate the inspector general's findings. The suit, which seeks unspecified damages, claims federal officials violated their rights by imprisoning them on the basis of their race and religion.

More than 80 men designated "of high interest" in the FBI investigation of the Sept. 11 attacks were jailed at the facility in Brooklyn between Sept. 14, 2001, and Aug. 27, 2002. The nine-story facility usually houses men and women charged with federal crimes, not immigration violations.

Inmates like Ebrahim and Baloch were classified "suspected terrorists" and put in high-security cell blocks normally reserved for dangerous inmates.

The men say they were denied access to phones and lawyers for weeks at a time, locked in tiny cells where lights burned all night, kept awake by guards pounding on their doors, put in handcuffs and shackles whenever outside their cells, and beaten at random.

"I was being hated by everyone around me wanting revenge for Sept. 11," Ebrahim said. He acknowledged staying past his visa's expiration but said he did nothing else illegal.

The abuse allegedly subsided once guards were ordered to videotape detainees outside their cells - a policy that prison officials said was designed simply to deter accusations of mistreatment. The officials cited an al-Qaida training manual that instructed terrorists to accuse their captors of abuse.

Ebrahim says one guard whispered: "The camera is your best friend. If not for the camera, I would have smashed your face."

In interviews with the Inspector General's investigators, most guards denied any wrongdoing. But one said he witnessed guards slam inmates against walls, and "stated this was a common practice before the MDC began videotaping the detainees," the report said.

The guard said a supervisor told him "it was all part of being in jail and not to worry about it."

Justice Department officials refuse to discuss the civil suit.

Government attorneys have asked a judge to dismiss the case, arguing Ashcroft and other defendants are shielded by immunity laws designed to ensure they can perform their official duties "without the chill and distraction of damages suits."

Ebrahim says the distraction of the lawsuit is nothing compared to hearing a knock on his door on Sept. 30, 2001, and being hauled away for reasons he says are still unclear to him.

"This is not supposed to happen in America," he said.

© 2003 The Associated Press

53 posted on 09/04/2004 6:00:06 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: steveegg

Jon Last at galley slaves broke this.....I just happened to see it over at instapundit.


54 posted on 09/04/2004 6:02:02 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: NEBO

If you need a reason to pray for Clinton, consider the political clout his death will give to Hillary.

She'd play the grieving widow, and invoke Clinton's name lovingly in speeches. Sympathy plus her baffling popularity with women will overshadow much of her politics and record... and it might be enough to propel her in the White House. (With Bill alive, she's the wife of a popular adulterer. Dead, she'd be the widow of a popular former President. My math says the former is politically good ammo... although alive he can appeal to those women who think he's handsome. So who knows...)

Pray for Bill! May he live a dozen more years.

//sarcasm/satire


55 posted on 09/04/2004 6:03:33 AM PDT by coconutt2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
More whistling past the graveyard by the Old Media as it circles the bowl...

Yes. :-)

Recently, the Leftists have been using a lot of air time to outline their definitions of real journalism.

"Old Media" is certainly more accurate than "journalism."

56 posted on 09/04/2004 6:05:30 AM PDT by syriacus (Kerry lied, while honorable men died. Benedict Arnold REALLY was a war hero before he was a traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NEBO

especially when sprinkled on the chest of a lovely young babe


57 posted on 09/04/2004 6:06:25 AM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog

You know what's going to happen don't you? This reporter is going to start feeling the heat and decide to spray paint political "slurs" on his car and then break a few windows around his house and blame it on right wing radicals because his name was revealed at FR.


58 posted on 09/04/2004 6:06:28 AM PDT by Rebelbase (John Kerry, sign form 180 .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
So why FReep Tom Hayes?....If this story has legs, it's his boss and the media watchdogs (oxymoron?) that need to here about this story. If each of us calls our LOCAL newspaper, TV/Radio and asks 'em why the AP flat out lied. Flat out. Make them defend the AP...
59 posted on 09/04/2004 6:07:23 AM PDT by Drango (Kerry is french toast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NEBO
I was thinking UGLY thoughts about Bill & Hillary

---
Me to, but then I thought about that old addage: If you can't say anything good about someone...don't say anything.

So to Bill and Hillary I say "..."
60 posted on 09/04/2004 6:09:21 AM PDT by gooleyman ((Half the Babies aborted would have grown up to be women. What about their "RIGHT TO CHOOSE"??????))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-246 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson