Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Air district takes steps toward regulating refinery flares (SCAQMD)
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 9/3/04 | AP

Posted on 09/03/2004 10:49:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

DIAMOND BAR, Calif. (AP) - Southern California air quality regulators took the first steps Friday toward regulating pollution from refinery flares - plumes of flame seen at the top of tall stacks in refineries and other facilities.

The South Coast Air Quality Management District's governing board ordered its staff to develop a proposed rule for reducing emissions from the flames used to relieve pressure and prevent fires or explosions.

The governing board intends to vote on the proposal once it is complete.

Refineries have voluntarily worked to reduce emissions from flares for several years, district executive officer Barry Wallerstein said in a statement.

A study found that emissions of sulfur oxides from the flares have gone from 7.2 tons per day in 2000 to 2 tons per day in 2003 - about the same as the total amount produced each day by diesel tractor trailers.

Sulfur oxides contribute to the creation of fine particulate pollution, which has been linked to respiratory problems and premature deaths.

The district has 27 flares in eight refineries, a sulfur recovery plant and a hydrogen production facility, all in Los Angeles County.

In another decision Friday, the district's governing board awarded $834,000 to school districts and bus operators to retrofit diesel school buses with particulate filter traps and to make other improvements to filter traps.

The district covers Orange County and parts of Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside counties.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: airdistricy; airpollution; calgov2002; california; energy; environment; flares; pollution; refinery; reglating; scaqmd; steps

1 posted on 09/03/2004 10:49:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well a few refinery explosions and the ensuing carnage and destruction should stop this idea. The problem is, how many people have to die and how much damage has to be done, before those idiots stop meddling.


2 posted on 09/03/2004 10:52:42 PM PDT by Mike1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Lets see, gas is over $ 2 per gallon, and these morons are going to make it harder and more expensive to operate a refinery.

But don't worry, as soon as a shortage develops, they will claim priority on whatever gas is available because of their status as "government regulators".

3 posted on 09/03/2004 11:14:54 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike1973
I used to live in a town that had a closed landfill. Flares burned off the methane. The waste company did a study on the possibility of powering generators, but it wasn't economical.

Talking with a gas company executive, he said "that methane is of too poor a quality" for an internal combustion engine
(converted diesel). Adding commercial methane to boost the BTUs would just really kill the economics of the plan.

Even if the refinery waste gases had the energy, the corrosion replacement costs would probably kill the project.

I bet the heat could be used generate electricity via a steam engine, though.

Just think, do it right, and maybe the steam could be used to make potable water.

4 posted on 09/03/2004 11:42:06 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson