Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cableguy

Would have been even higher if they hadn't used Greta for the After-Convention coverage where she had loose canons like Estrech on -- and managed to cover the Laci Peterson case when we were watching for convention analysis -- I switched to MSNBC for the after-convention coverage because they did have both Republicans and Dems and fairly, fair coverage -- plus it was highly entertaining with the Chris Matthews/Zell Miller dust-up... Fox should take heed, that was a stroke of genuis of MSNBC to do their analysis the way they did -- I would have enjoyed a Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Alan (Yuck) Combs, Dick Morris, Newt Gengrich, etc., after-election coverage instead of the Greta Hour and then reruns.


13 posted on 09/03/2004 11:01:48 AM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arizona Carolyn

I can't understand why extremist haters like Ron Reagan and Susan Estrich are put on TV. They drag the conversation down to such nasty levels.

There are far more well-reasoned and level-headed liberals whom they can have on. Mara Liasson, who appears with Brit Hume every night is bright, articulate and intelligent. Her opinion is to the left, but she does a great job without getting pissy.

There MUST be more liberal journalists out there like her that they can get on Fox. I can't watch Estrich when she comes on. She's just such a nasty, ill-mannered, mean-spirited and shrill party-line liberal.

Fox is still the only network that I know of that has people from both sides of the aisle who are ALLOWED to speak. Others may have them on, but they're only on for the commentators to yell over.


23 posted on 09/03/2004 11:27:10 AM PDT by risen_feenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson