Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neocon Shavuz

When you are in a fight it's the aggressor who initially sets the parameters of the fight. If you don't match those parameters and then some you are going to lose the fight. The difference is that once we have ended the fight we go back to being ourselves. If it were a matter of becoming indistinguishable from them then we would leave that fight and head out looking for another. When you decline to use whatever methods necessary to end a fight as soon as possible you are simply accepting a higher toll for the battle/war than if you had ended it quickly. Several hundred thousand people lost their lives when we used atomic bombs against Japan. The alternative was an invasion of their homeland and the lives lost would have numbered in the millions, many of the allied forces. If by ending that war as quickly as possible meant we had lowered ourselves to their level we would have used nuclear weapons in Korea. Fighting fire with fire does not make one an arsonist.


134 posted on 09/03/2004 11:05:33 AM PDT by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: jwpjr
I disagree. Your example is good, I admit, but that situation is different. I think we have to maintain the moral superiority. Otherwise we would kill each other's children without a reason. Animal kingdom.

I will not be able to kill children. I hope neither will you.
172 posted on 09/03/2004 11:20:58 AM PDT by Neocon Shavuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson