Posted on 09/03/2004 10:04:07 AM PDT by ezfindit
This is awful. I remember when the Spanish trains were bombed a lot of people sent flowers to the embassies. I think we should do that here also.
Terrorism and killing of children should be condemned regardless of the religious orientation of the perpetrator or victim.
Whenever someone starts quoting "international human rights organizations" we know they are terrorist sympathizers. You just blew your cover Mr. Bin Laden.
Ten of the, now fortunately dead scum, terrorists were Arabs. They did not allow the children to use the toilets for three days. They allowed them NO WATER. They forced them to drink their own urine from the bottles they allowed them to urinate in. They forced them to stand incessantly without food or drink. They used them as human shields when they tried their cowardly escape from the school. What moral or historical equivalence are you talking about, Mister?
Alberlooney is an America-hating muslim.
I don't care if they do or not.
Even the death of children (who, only below a certain age, are the only "innocents") when forced to remain among the murdering sandmaggot scum using them as shields is not "indiscriminate". Nice try though, sandmaggot apologist. See my post 194.
International human rights organizations have said a lot of things that turn out not to be true -- for example, the Jenin "massacre." They have shown too much political motivation to be believed. The US and all other governments likewise condemn things because of political motivation.
I have not seen proof that Russia deliberately targeted, hunted down and killed Chechen children (if they did, I would consider it terrorism). I have, however, seen plenty of proof that Arab-allied terrorists' MO is to hide behind their children, thereby getting those poor children killed when the terrorists are attacked. In cases like that, I blame the terrorists themselves for their kids' deaths.
Do you agree?
"Hello. The difference between bombing a city with schools and bombing a school is that when you bomb a city you hit many schools."
I am not a military man, but I have enough sense to know that bombing runs are often designed to miss schools and similar targets of non-military value. So your statement is not necessarily true. As a matter of diplomacy and psy-ops, it's not in Russia's interest to purposely bomb children, and they have the wherewithal to manage themselves.
"These Chechen terrorists have non-Chechen allies."
Are you saying that the Chechens hired mercenary forces to do this for them? That does not sound very likely, if this is merely a response to Russian actions. Likewise, it shows that this is a wider war against an organized islamic terrorist menace.
War or something much worse
"Islam is a religion of peace"
What evidence to you offer for this blatant delusion.
There has never been peace where Islam comes in contact with any other non Islamic culture.
Islam is a death cult. It worships blood shed especially of innocents.
These "International human rights organizations" did not condemn Bin Laden's attack on the U.S., nor Saddam Hussein's genocides. These "international human rights organizations" are Al Qaeda's best friends.
Prayer for you and yours.
The likely word used by the Russian troops was dukhai.
You're damned right I am .... muslims have brought this on themselves and DESERVE it.
I have a Russian friend (Khazakstan.) He say "Chechnya, very bad people."
Yep, I think it's time for the "much worse" to kick in, otherwise these demons will start getting more and more ideas from each other and spread the mayhem even further. The longer the just fail to act, the more innocence will suffer.
http://www.orthodoxnet.com
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.