You mean the party of Kennedy, clinton, Kerry, Daschle, Pelosi? His voice would have been drowned out by the majority.
His voice last night was not.
Dear kattracks,
"You mean the party of Kennedy, clinton, Kerry, Daschle, Pelosi? His voice would have been drowned out by the majority."
This is a reason to be pro-abort?
Then why are we critical of all the pro-abort Catholic politicians? Especially the Democrat ones? After all, it isn't as if their voice would be heard if they were pro-life. Isn't that the calculation Dennis Kucinich made this year? To be a viable national Democrat, he had to trade in his pro-life beliefs for a pro-abort stance?
Isn't that what Ted Kennedy did back in the 1970s? Why criticize poor old Chappaquiddick Ted, then? He's just doing what he had to do to be viable in the Democrat Party.
John Kerry, too. Why do we want the bishops to give him a bad time? This is just what he has to do to be heard in Democrat Party politics.
Sorry, I have infinitely more admiration for the late Gov. Casey, a pro-life Democrat, than I do for Mr. Miller, a pro-abort Democrat through nearly his entire political career. I'd be willing to bet a dollar to a donut that Mr. Casey likely had less explaining to do at his Particular Judgment than Mr. Miller will have at his.
But I am happy that Mr. Miller finally listened to his conscience. Better late than never.
sitetest