Posted on 09/01/2004 9:47:39 PM PDT by Pikamax
THE MILLER MOMENT: Zell Miller's address will, I think, go down as a critical moment in this campaign, and maybe in the history of the Republican party. I kept thinking of the contrast with the Democrats' keynote speaker, Barack Obama, a post-racial, smiling, expansive young American, speaking about national unity and uplift. Then you see Zell Miller, his face rigid with anger, his eyes blazing with years of frustration as his Dixiecrat vision became slowly eclipsed among the Democrats. Remember who this man is: once a proud supporter of racial segregation, a man who lambasted LBJ for selling his soul to the negroes. His speech tonight was in this vein, a classic Dixiecrat speech, jammed with bald lies, straw men, and hateful rhetoric. As an immigrant to this country and as someone who has been to many Southern states and enjoyed astonishing hospitality and warmth and sophistication, I long dismissed some of the Northern stereotypes about the South. But Miller did his best to revive them. The man's speech was not merely crude; it added whole universes to the word crude.
THE "OCCUPATION" CANARD: Miller first framed his support for Bush as a defense of his own family. The notion that individuals deserve respect regardless of their family is not Miller's core value. And the implication was that if the Democrats win in November, his own family would not be physically safe. How's that for subtlety? Miller's subsequent assertion was that any dissent from aspects of the war on terror is equivalent to treason. He accused all war critics of essentially attacking the very troops of the United States. He conflated the ranting of Michael Moore with the leaders of the Democrats. He said the following: Motivated more by partisan politics than by national security, today's Democratic leaders see America as an occupier, not a liberator. And nothing makes this Marine madder than someone calling American troops occupiers rather than liberators. That macho invocation of the Marines was a classic: the kind of militarist swagger that this convention endorses and uses as a bludgeon against its opponents. But the term "occupation," of course, need not mean the opposite of liberation. I have used the term myself and I deeply believe that coalition troops have indeed liberated Afghanistan and Iraq. By claiming that the Democrats were the enemies of the troops, traitors, quislings and wimps, Miller did exactly what he had the audacity to claim the Democrats were doing: making national security a partisan matter. I'm not easy to offend, but this speech was gob-smackingly vile.
OPPONENTS OR ENEMIES?: Here's another slur: No one should dare to even think about being the Commander in Chief of this country if he doesn't believe with all his heart that our soldiers are liberators abroad and defenders of freedom at home. But don't waste your breath telling that to the leaders of my party today. In their warped way of thinking America is the problem, not the solution. They don't believe there is any real danger in the world except that which America brings upon itself through our clumsy and misguided foreign policy. Yes, that describes some on the left, but it is a calumny against Democrats who voted for war in Afghanistan and Iraq and whose sincerity, as John McCain urged, should not be in question. I have never heard Kerry say that 9/11 was America's fault; if I had, it would be inconceivable to consider supporting him. And so this was, in truth, another lie, another cheap, faux-patriotic smear. Miller has absolutely every right to lambaste John Kerry's record on defense in the Senate. It's ripe for criticism, and, for my part, I disagree with almost all of it (and as a pro-Reagan, pro-Contra, pro-SDI, pro-Gulf War conservative, I find Kerry's record deeply troubling). But that doesn't mean he's a traitor or hates America's troops or believes that the U.S. is responsible for global terror. And the attempt to say so is a despicable attempt to smear someone's very patriotism.
THE FOREIGN AGENT: Another lie: "Senator Kerry has made it clear that he would use military force only if approved by the United Nations. Kerry would let Paris decide when America needs defending. I want Bush to decide." Miller might have found some shred of ancient rhetoric that will give him cover on this, but in Kerry's very acceptance speech, he declared the opposite conviction - that he would never seek permission to defend this country. Another lie: "John Kerry wants to re-fight yesterday's war." Kerry didn't want to do that. Yes, he used his military service in the campaign - but it was his opponents who decided to dredge up the divisions of the Vietnam war in order to describe Kerry as a Commie-loving traitor who faked his own medals. What's remarkable about the Republicans is their utter indifference to fairness in their own attacks. Smearing opponents as traitors to their country, as unfit to be commander-in-chief, as agents of foreign powers (France) is now fair game. Appealing to the crudest form of patriotism and the easiest smears is wrong when it is performed by the lying Michael Moore and it is wrong when it is spat out by Zell Miller. Last night was therefore a revealing night for me. I watched a Democrat at a GOP Convention convince me that I could never be a Republican. If they wheel out lying, angry old men like this as their keynote, I'll take Obama. Any day.
- 2:21:48 AM
Who the hell is Andrew Sullivan? And why should we care what he has to say?
Why doesn't this guy just flip and get it over with? He just wants to marry his boyfriend and mean old Dubya won't let him.
Head on over to the rats, Andrew.
Andrew Sullivan is the most boring Girlie-man on this planet next to Kerry. Thankfully he's in Kerry's camp. I just couldn't bear it if I agreed with him.
A.S. is badmouthing Sen. Byrd??
One of them there girlie men?
Sullivan just wants in our pants. He wants to get into our pocket books so he and his fellow sex socialists can pay even lower taxes than the rank and file American. Marriage for him is a discount to be swank.
He's a pervert who wants to corrupt your sons, then marry them. Ignore him.
Read, Sullivan, you moron. The speech didn't call Kerry a traitor or say he hated America's troops. And Democrats insinuate, often outright state that our policy is responsible for increased terrorism. Kerry's speech to the vets today said exactly that.
He's a fairly influential (or at least he used to be) right-of-center (or at least he used to be) opinion journalist who has decided that gay marriage is the most important issue in our post-9/11 world.
He's sort of the anti-Ed-Koch.
Sullivan jumped the shark quite a while ago. He's led by sheer emotion and self-absorption, not logic or ideas. Such a waste.
BTW, the demokrat talking point on Miller is that he moved to R camp because he is a racist. Hmmm...Klanmaster Byrd doesn't seem to have a problem staying a 'rat.
... said the internet's leading drama queen... :)
"He conflated the ranting of Michael Moore with the leaders of the Democrats."
Have I missed the Democratic leaders distancing themselves from Moore?
Yeh, it created the Kerry legacy of being "The Spit Ball Commander". LOL!!!!!
Andrew Sullivan is a pansy. But I insult a flower that stands bad weather remarkably well. All this fellow here does is express all the bigotry that most liberal northerners feel toward all southerners, except the liberals' black watercarriers.
Yeah, I agree Sullivan is now just another homosexual demokrat. Those are a dime a dozen.
Uhh... "gob-smackingly"? Ewwww.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.