Posted on 09/01/2004 12:40:13 PM PDT by kattracks
(CNSNews.com) - Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry Wednesday criticized President Bush's approach to the war in Iraq and the post-war reconstruction efforts, saying he would have done "almost everything differently."
Speaking at the National American Legion in Nashville, Tenn., Kerry said the president had "no real plan for post-war political transition."
"When it comes to Iraq, it's not that I would have done one thing differently. I would have done almost everything differently," the senator said. "I would have relied on American troops in Tora Bora, the best troops in the world, when we had Osama bin Laden in our sights trapped in the mountains.
"I would not have sent Afghans up into those mountains, who a week earlier were fighting on the other side. I would have sent the best trained forces in the world to get the number one criminal and terrorist in the world," he added.
Kerry said he would never have "diverted resources so quickly" from Afghanistan before capturing bin Laden.
Kerry added that he would have given weapons inspectors in Iraq more time to search for weapons of mass destruction, not because inspectors would have found all the weapons, "but because by doing do, we could have brought other countries to our side."
That way, he said, "you provide the best protection" and "you provide America with the greatest chance of success."
In addition, Kerry said he would have listened to senior advisers, provided state-of-the-art body armor, humvees and equipment to soldiers in Iraq, and built a "strong, broad coalition" of allies worldwide.
Kerry bashed Bush's use of the term "catastrophic success," saying the U.S. must bring "our allies to our side," share the burden of the war that is currently costing the U.S. taxpayer, and reduce the risks to U.S. soldiers.
"I don't think we need what President Bush has defined as a catastrophic success. I think we need a real success," Kerry said. He suggested that the military "more rapidly train Iraqi police and military" to take over the protection of Iraq.
The Democrat also criticized President Bush's original comments on Monday about the war on terror in an interview with NBC's Matt Lauer, in which Bush said, "I don't think you can win it. But I think you can create conditions so that those who use terror as a tool are less acceptable in parts of the world. Let's put it that way."
On Tuesday, Bush told the American Legion, "We may never sit down at a peace table, but make no mistake about it, we are winning and we will win." Bush repeated the phrase "we will win" a number of times.
"I know he said something different to you yesterday, but I absolutely disagree with what he said in that interview in a moment of candor," Kerry said.
"With the right policies, this is a war we can win, this is a war we must win, and this is a war we will win, because we're the can-do people and there's nothing we can't do if we put our mind and our muscle to it," he said. "In the end, the terrorists will lose and we will win because the future does not belong to fear, it belongs to freedom."
Kerry's solution to winning the war on terror includes adding 40,000 active duty troops to the military, although not in Iraq.
"Nine out of ten of our Army divisions are now either in Iraq, going to Iraq, coming back from Iraq, getting ready to go to Iraq... even as Iran and North Korea get more dangerous. Our troops are overstretched, overextended, under pressure. I intend to double our special forces to conduct anti-terrorist operations," he said.
Kerry also said he would end the "back-door draft of the National Guard and reservists that is taking place today."
See Also:
Democrats Accuse Bush of 'Flip-Flopping' on Winning the War (Sept. 1, 2004)
Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.
Being from Canada, my liberal press friends have informed me I am always supposed to hate America etc especially conservative Americans....
Of course I know who are one of the most giving peoples in the world and whose company I enjoy. And I guess I also know that this was the best ever victories ever for the USA both in Halfganistan as well as in Iraq. And I know Libya has changed its ways without even having to fire a shot! Like it only took 20 friggin days to win Bagdad for crying outloud. So I guess I gotta ask sKerry a question. If he would do almost everything different, then what would he (Kerry) have done to improve the best ever wars the Americans (with their allies) have ever conducted?
Uh-huh. Sure. That's why you opposed the bill that attempted to do precisely that.
"Hindsight is always perfect."
For most people anyway, I wouldn't trust Kerry with a cent let along the Iraqi war wether he knew the results or not.
It's Monday morning in America, and Kerry is our quarterback.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Woulda, coulda, shoulda.
He would have helped Sadaam acquire WMD. It's only fair.
He would have invaded Iraq through Nova Scotia ?
There should have been laughter in the hall when he said this.
"It was so chilly, I thought Kerry's nose would break off from frostbite"
If that is the case, Kerry is sinking fast.
I wonder if the Old News Media is going to report it.
"Kerry added that he would have given weapons inspectors in Iraq more time to search for weapons of mass destruction, not because inspectors would have found all the weapons, 'but because by doing do, we could have brought other countries to our side.'"
This statement drives me CRAZY! WHY do people keep saying that the inspectors needed more time to search for weapons???! That was NOT their job. They were supposed to be SHOWN the weapons so they could inspect them. They WERE NOT supposed to "search" for them, they were supposed to "inspect" them! Arrrrrghhhhh!
Kerry wants to pull out our troops so the French and Germans can send theirs in. Why the heck would they want to? What's in it for them other than having THEIR soldiers shot at and beheaded? He must be living in a parallel universe where they would go along with a demonstration of American spinelessness by being tougher on terrorists than America.
Kerry quoted in Newsday 1994 regarding the American Legion's opposition to the Kerry-McCain campaign for normalization of trade relations with Viet Nam.
We do know that Kerry would have refused our troops the weapons they needed, so that's one thing
Yeah, but Mr. Internationale would also have used "American troops in Tora Bora, the best troops in the world" rather than cooperating with our partners in Afghanistan.
Easy....to re-establish the "special" oil contracts they had with Saddam.....
With Kerry as Commander and Chief....
'Defeat' would have been snatched from the 'Jaws of Victory'
I doubt it. Sounds more like he's taking talking points from Michael Moore again.
The whole thing was completely incoherent. Another point Kerry keeps making is that he will have 40,000 more troops in the army and NOT deploy them to Iraq. He will send them to places like Germany and Iceland because our troop strength there is so thin.
He also said he would close the "backdoor draft" of the National Guard. I seriously doubt the average American Legion member hates the very existence of the National Guard.
The ONLY thing Kerry could have done differently than Pres Bush
would have been....
TO LOOSE....
I think they are right. The old fashioned ideas they had were American strength, freedom, liberty. Kerry has TOTALLY dropped those "old" ideas!!!!
This gets my vote!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.