--------------------------------
To print out and wear as a Campaign Button, go HERE. Over 3,100 hits as of 9/1! Feel free to reuse this anywhere you wish...Donate to Swift Boat Vets for the Truth HERE.
Posted on 09/01/2004 12:40:13 PM PDT by kattracks
(CNSNews.com) - Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry Wednesday criticized President Bush's approach to the war in Iraq and the post-war reconstruction efforts, saying he would have done "almost everything differently."
Speaking at the National American Legion in Nashville, Tenn., Kerry said the president had "no real plan for post-war political transition."
"When it comes to Iraq, it's not that I would have done one thing differently. I would have done almost everything differently," the senator said. "I would have relied on American troops in Tora Bora, the best troops in the world, when we had Osama bin Laden in our sights trapped in the mountains.
"I would not have sent Afghans up into those mountains, who a week earlier were fighting on the other side. I would have sent the best trained forces in the world to get the number one criminal and terrorist in the world," he added.
Kerry said he would never have "diverted resources so quickly" from Afghanistan before capturing bin Laden.
Kerry added that he would have given weapons inspectors in Iraq more time to search for weapons of mass destruction, not because inspectors would have found all the weapons, "but because by doing do, we could have brought other countries to our side."
That way, he said, "you provide the best protection" and "you provide America with the greatest chance of success."
In addition, Kerry said he would have listened to senior advisers, provided state-of-the-art body armor, humvees and equipment to soldiers in Iraq, and built a "strong, broad coalition" of allies worldwide.
Kerry bashed Bush's use of the term "catastrophic success," saying the U.S. must bring "our allies to our side," share the burden of the war that is currently costing the U.S. taxpayer, and reduce the risks to U.S. soldiers.
"I don't think we need what President Bush has defined as a catastrophic success. I think we need a real success," Kerry said. He suggested that the military "more rapidly train Iraqi police and military" to take over the protection of Iraq.
The Democrat also criticized President Bush's original comments on Monday about the war on terror in an interview with NBC's Matt Lauer, in which Bush said, "I don't think you can win it. But I think you can create conditions so that those who use terror as a tool are less acceptable in parts of the world. Let's put it that way."
On Tuesday, Bush told the American Legion, "We may never sit down at a peace table, but make no mistake about it, we are winning and we will win." Bush repeated the phrase "we will win" a number of times.
"I know he said something different to you yesterday, but I absolutely disagree with what he said in that interview in a moment of candor," Kerry said.
"With the right policies, this is a war we can win, this is a war we must win, and this is a war we will win, because we're the can-do people and there's nothing we can't do if we put our mind and our muscle to it," he said. "In the end, the terrorists will lose and we will win because the future does not belong to fear, it belongs to freedom."
Kerry's solution to winning the war on terror includes adding 40,000 active duty troops to the military, although not in Iraq.
"Nine out of ten of our Army divisions are now either in Iraq, going to Iraq, coming back from Iraq, getting ready to go to Iraq... even as Iran and North Korea get more dangerous. Our troops are overstretched, overextended, under pressure. I intend to double our special forces to conduct anti-terrorist operations," he said.
Kerry also said he would end the "back-door draft of the National Guard and reservists that is taking place today."
See Also:
Democrats Accuse Bush of 'Flip-Flopping' on Winning the War (Sept. 1, 2004)
Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.
... in direct conflict with their own interests.
He'd be waiting a long time.
What makes Kerry particularly scary is that he doesn't seem to understand this. I think he takes our European friends at face value, which is surely a bad thing in this Age of Nuance.
D
Like committing atrocities, getting medals for them, then hurling those medals on the White House Lawn.
This was a crucial speech for Kerry.
How was he received?
That's the thing. He can look back in time and say what he would have done differently, but he cannot come up with a strategy going forward. What a twerp.
Kerry wanted to co-opt Iraq's oil revenues to pay for the invasion and reconstruction.
Imagine how well that would've gone over with the Arabs, to have us in fact steal the oil?
It is bad enough that they allege that we are stealing their oil, but to actually do it? Kerry's policies as a president would threaten to turn every Arab against us, not just the extremists. As it is now,weare doing quite well to have the support of the moderates and the silent majority... At least that's what I'm reading between the lines.
As Rush said, Kerry would have sent little Johnny Edwards in to file a class action lawsuit against Saddam.
I really doubt that.
If we can't have a Conservative Senator, at least we should have totally ineffective liberals...
If Kerry was actually there, he would have collected three bandaid wounds and shagged a*s out of there.
Exactly. Monday morning President.
I would have done everything differently in WWII. I would've declared war on Hitler when he re-occupied the Rhineland, encouraging a coup by the Wehrmacht that would have overthrown him and prevented the whole war and the Holocaust. Then I would have helped the Russians overthrow Stalin, preventing the cold war. Then I would have annexed Saudi Arabia and turned it into a secular democracy, preventing Arab terrorism. Can I be President now?
Hindsight is always 20/20 and always PERFECT.
To print out and wear as a Campaign Button, go HERE. Over 3,100 hits as of 9/1! Feel free to reuse this anywhere you wish...It was a DOA speech. Weak applause for his spending on vets promises, total silence when he attacked Bush on Iraq.
It was so chilly, I thought Kerry's nose would break off from frostbite.
Not really. It's just the short version of how the dems handled Vietnam.
Genius, John, pure genius. You would have rather sent our troops into unknown territory rather than those who were familiar with the area in which they were entering.
Me thinks that if Afghanistan were fought John Kerry's way, we would have had FAR more casualties. Is a man who would make such a tactical blunder REALLY capable of leading this country?
That one relies on a lot of ignorance, but maybe it will gain traction.
None other than Mumia made exactly that point last week. It's pretty sad when a cop-killer makes more sense than the Rat candidate for president!
He took credit for that. He said he and McCain cleared up that whole POW/MIA issue and that he personally wrote the legislation regarding Agent Orange.
We had almost everyone except France on our side......and France has NO track record of lowering the risks to our soldiers. Considering how tough it is for our soldiers now, imagine how much more difficult it would be over there if they were having to babysit French "soldiers" as well as fight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.