To: Remember_Salamis
Those Bush daughters!!!!!
2 posted on
08/31/2004 10:25:03 PM PDT by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
To: Remember_Salamis
3 posted on
08/31/2004 10:25:44 PM PDT by
flashbunny
(Kerry helped move jobs to china - http://www.flashbunny.org/commentary/kerryoutsourced.html)
To: Remember_Salamis
Looks like a good entry point.
5 posted on
08/31/2004 10:26:12 PM PDT by
JamesP
To: Remember_Salamis
The RNC overplayed their hand putting those two up there between two genuinely big names. The Sex-in-the-City mocking of Grandma can put off a lot of middle-americans. That show is slutty trash and most Bush voters reject it. To throw it in Barbara's face was in essence throwing it in all our faces. These supposedly adult girls gave a speech fit for a precocious, bratty 14 year old. The Stupid Party strikes again...
To: Remember_Salamis
>>the godawful Bush Twins speech<<
I read the transcript. Who wrote that crap?
7 posted on
08/31/2004 10:27:22 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
("Lieutenant Ricebottom reporting for duty.")
To: Remember_Salamis
Let's just hope that it wasn't because of the godawful Bush Twins speech, with traders thinking that anybody who'd allow that stinker of a speech up there doesn't know what they're doing. Get real. No one watched the Bush daughters speech. I turned the volume down and proceeded to hop on the phone to discuss the Arnie's speech.
9 posted on
08/31/2004 10:28:13 PM PDT by
Smogger
To: Remember_Salamis
The Bush Daughters effect, if there really is one, will disappear by the end of the convention. Bigger fish to fry, as they say.
10 posted on
08/31/2004 10:29:21 PM PDT by
RockinRight
(Liberalism IS the status quo)
To: Remember_Salamis
Anyone who thinks the CUTE Bush daughter's silly speech will effect even one single vote should head on back to DU. :)
To: Remember_Salamis
"godawful Bush twins speech"
Give me an f'n break. That is an irrelevant twenty minutes at the RNC. That would not have any effect on the campaign much less a 10 point swing. Even if you don't like the girls' sensibilities don't blow things out of proportion.
Geez!
27 posted on
08/31/2004 10:36:41 PM PDT by
Reaganez
To: Remember_Salamis
I think they got their positives and negatives screwed up. Happens all the time, or maybe some nimrod accidental got the data mixed up.
I just can't see this as being a realistic chart of what is going on right now.
30 posted on
08/31/2004 10:37:58 PM PDT by
dila813
To: Remember_Salamis
Our stock in the "Congressional Control" market is literally shooting through the roof however.
To: Remember_Salamis
How deep is this "market"? Are the stats on volume and contract size available? How is a trade actually conducted and administered?
Is it possible that just a few trades can move the market?
53 posted on
08/31/2004 10:46:42 PM PDT by
There's millions of'em
(Terayza Heinze owns the MSM,.. but it was a small investment.)
To: Remember_Salamis
Price on Kerry was seen as an overlay.
82 posted on
08/31/2004 11:05:41 PM PDT by
alydar
(March)
To: Remember_Salamis
Something's amiss here. Tradesports is trading normally and the current quotes for the IEM are showing the old 7.5% Bush lead. Kinda weird.
To: Remember_Salamis; All
I doubt this has anything to do with the Bush twins' speech. It more likely reflects confidence by the Democrats in John Kerry's new Clintonista campaign team. They probably think Joe Lockhardt will do wonders for Kerry.
To: Remember_Salamis
I'm sure you are right. This was profit taking. The figures are back where they were before. At 1.30 CST last quotes were
0.455 for Kerry 0.540 for Bush (average 0.469 to 0.544).
So no "twin effect".
; )
ScaniaBoy
96 posted on
08/31/2004 11:42:14 PM PDT by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson