Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Irene Adler
I never really understood why they didn't.

Here's my explanation:

American voters HATE sore losers. No quicker way to end a political career than to become one.

Thune knew this and took the gracious loser role knowing he could come back and fight another day.

His political base was rock-solid...he had won his previous statewide congressional races by huge margins.

Looks to me like he's turning out to have been pretty darned smart.

43 posted on 08/31/2004 5:50:04 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

Isn't it ironic, that all of Dashle's dirty tricks to keep himself majority leader, may end up being the cause of his own demise by setting him up with a real opponent?


49 posted on 08/31/2004 8:08:30 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

There were a number of people on FR who thought that Thune should have challenged the results. A majority realized that (a) you never win the seat back when voter fraud is challenged and (b) Thune would have a better chance against a Daschle whose liberal positions are well-known during a presidential election year.


61 posted on 09/01/2004 9:01:56 AM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson