This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 08/30/2004 10:38:57 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Duplicate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1203065/posts |
Posted on 08/30/2004 10:31:43 AM PDT by crushelits
Washington As a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission, I may not agree with many positions taken by speakers this week at the Republican National Convention. Even so, I believe our broadcast media owe us more coverage of an event that remains an important component of the presidential campaign. Yet tonight, if people around the country tune in to the commercial broadcast TV networks, most will not see any live convention coverage. That's not right.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Memo to Copps: Then if you don't like your own policy, RESIGN!
Are the alphabet networks denying coverage to the Republican National Convention!?
from what I heard, yes..
It's called freedom & it does have some downside to it. What should we do - force everyone to watch gavel-to-gavel conventions once every 4 years, have mandatory reading lists, censor movies & books?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.