Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teeman8r

Well, what you say is true, but by current law a convicted felon is prohibited from even touching a firearm, so by carrying, you would be "using the gun in a crime [which] should carry severe jail time" ;)

Mind you, if the Miller case was about the sawed off shotgun not being a militia weapon, then the AWB is doubly unconstitutional - but there hangs a tale for another day...


50 posted on 08/31/2004 1:48:53 AM PDT by bt_dooftlook ((Kerry/Edwards - Stay the Coarse))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: bt_dooftlook

with government falling just shy of making breathing a crime, one needs to evaluate who sets standards and the constitution seems to be the last place judges look these days... with the opinion polls of major urban areas and european courts being first and second.

i am for stricter penalties for committing crimes, but having one's rights eliminated forever is severe and unconstitutional... if one is allowed "out" then restoration is due... my humblest of opinions...

and yes i concur the awb was doubly unconstitutional...

teeman


52 posted on 08/31/2004 6:38:26 AM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson