60 is not inches away from 67.
Even if it recieved 66 it would still have been veto-proof.
I have followed Congress long enough that people do not change their votes when it comes to overriding a veto. IN fact, the vote to override never would have had even the most miniscule chance of making it onto the floor of either chamber.
Even if it wasn't veto proof, which it was, comfortably, he still shouldn't have signed it. He should have put all the onus on Congress.
The fact is, he was for it, he signed it, it's his responsibility.
Why don't you simply admit that you are in FR campaigning against the re-election of George W. Bush and be done it?