Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Long Cut
I never denied making personal attacks. I simply pointed out that you have made nothing but personal attacks.

Hadit2here's posts were quite a good refutation of yours, as were Risk's.

Your's sure weren't.

TJ posts these excursions into Constitutional wishful thinking regularly, and is just as regularly refuted.

Not by you. You see, I don't have to refute your posts with facts because you don't present facts. All you do is insult and smear so all you are worth is insults in return.

140 posted on 08/31/2004 7:13:52 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (Nemo Me Impune Lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: Tailgunner Joe; risk; jimt; NCPAC; tpaine; All
"I never denied making personal attacks. I simply pointed out that you have made nothing but personal attacks."

Omitting posts of mine that MIGHT be called "personal attacks" by someone hypersensitive (although I found only three that referred directly to other posters at all), my posts # 21, 22, 27, 28, 33, 53, 85, 123, 134, and #137 had nothing of the kind. You are, to be VERY kind, exxagerating severely, in the face of easily available facts. You're also quite sensitive to disagreement, aren't you? DISAGREEMENT, Joe, and a statement of it, does not constitute an "attack", nor does pointed questioning or analysis. In actuality, only one post I can find came anywhere near an attack. You just killed your credibility there.

" Your's sure weren't."

I'll let others decide that...the others who read this thread. You are hardly unbiased.

" Not by you."

I just asked questions. Others DID, so that comment was irrelevant. Besides, the things I did post were accurate.

"You see, I don't have to refute your posts with facts because you don't present facts. All you do is insult and smear so all you are worth is insults in return."

Let's get this straight...you first lie about my posts being "attacks and smears", when you have been doing just that for the past fifty posts at least, then you claim no need to refute with facts? Incredible.

To all: anyone wishing to verify Joe's contentions is advised to read the whole thread. It's illuminating.

I guess once you're through pasting the latest pamphlets, attacks and slander are all one has after people respond with logic, reason, and Constitutional cites.

And you wonder why I so profoundly mistrust those, like you Joe, who insist that "just this little bit" of tyranny is O-K?

144 posted on 08/31/2004 11:01:09 AM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson