My assertions are supported by Supreme Court decisions, legal opinions and the intent of the Founders. You yourself admit that your interpretation is the result of changed expectations of the meaning of the First Amendment. If you want to agree with the ACLU that any preference or promotion of religion violate the Wall of Separation, just don't claim that you are following the Founders who did not hold this definition of Separation at all.
Thank you, TGJ. Your arguments clearly demonstrate why we need a first amendment. It's definitely worth defending. If I thought President Bush agreed with you, I would discourage anyone I could to vote against him. I'm confident that he can keep his Christianity a private matter, however. It's clear that you can't.