Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: areafiftyone
Maybe they've read Richard Miniter's book, Losing Bin Laden.
2 posted on
08/29/2004 8:02:28 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: areafiftyone
3 posted on
08/29/2004 8:03:07 AM PDT by
Peach
(The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: areafiftyone
Hey BILL!!! Here is your LEGACY!!!!! Bwahahahhahahahaha
4 posted on
08/29/2004 8:04:30 AM PDT by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
To: areafiftyone
A New York Times poll of 9/11 victim families released on Sunday shows that more Americans who lost relatives in the worst terrorist attack in the nation's history hold President Clinton responsible rather than President Bush.
6 posted on
08/29/2004 8:05:27 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: areafiftyone
Hmmmmm would the NYT DARE to have an editorial on this tidbit?
8 posted on
08/29/2004 8:06:44 AM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: areafiftyone
A New York Times poll of 9/11 victim families released on Sunday shows that more Americans who lost relatives in the worst terrorist attack in the nation's history hold President Clinton responsible rather than President Bush. New York Times...hold President Clinton responsible..This has got to be a fake. Those seven words never appear in the same sentence...Impossible!
10 posted on
08/29/2004 8:08:26 AM PDT by
Imaverygooddriver
(I`m John Kerry and I approve this message: "I am a pinko punk azz")
To: areafiftyone
"The paper declined to release specific figures for the finding, based on a survey of 339 relatives of 9/11 victims, explaining, "The study differs from a scientific survey in that the total population of living relatives of 9/11 victims is unknown and therefore could not be sampled precisely or randomly."" Theyre not releasing it because its overwhelmingly detrimental to Democrats.
15 posted on
08/29/2004 8:11:09 AM PDT by
elfman2
To: areafiftyone
The paper declined to release specific figures for the finding, based on a survey of 339 relatives of 9/11 victims, explaining, "The study differs from a scientific survey in that the total population of living relatives of 9/11 victims is unknown and therefore could not be sampled precisely or randomly." Interestingly, the Times frequently publishes poll results on the national election with a few hundred or a thousand in the sample. I would say 339 is a valid sample to draw conclusions about the close-in relatives of the 2,800 9/11 victims.
16 posted on
08/29/2004 8:12:13 AM PDT by
AC86UT89
To: areafiftyone
Oh, dear! Hill will have to shut the 9/11 families up, big time.
17 posted on
08/29/2004 8:12:57 AM PDT by
hershey
To: areafiftyone
Great news.
However, this morning FoxNews showed over 2700+ people (each representing one of the dead victims of 9/11) each ringing bells at the Ground Zero site.
They are protesting and blaming, who else? Bush. For his involvement and policies that led to the war, and 9/11.
I sure hope that this poll questioned more than the number of people involved in this stunt. I am not sure if they were family members. If they were, my condolences for them.
Anyone else see this?
20 posted on
08/29/2004 8:14:03 AM PDT by
kstewskis
(BUSH-GIBSON 2004)
To: areafiftyone
The paper declined to release specific figures for the finding, based on a survey of 339 relatives of 9/11 victims, explaining, "The study differs from a scientific survey in that the total population of living relatives of 9/11 victims is unknown and therefore could not be sampled precisely or randomly."I can't recall another instance in which the NY Times conducted a poll, published a general statement about the outcome, but REFUSED to release the specific numbers associated with the poll. It must have really been bad for Klinton.
To: areafiftyone
Mrs. Clinton also claimed that the 9/11 Commission had praised her husband's handling of the 1999 Millennium threat as "exemplary," though the Commission actually attributes the foiling of the Millennium bomb plot to "luck" alone. LMAO! What threat?
Another pathetic Klintoon lie? Or was I just having too much fun on that New Year's Eve?
22 posted on
08/29/2004 8:16:46 AM PDT by
kstewskis
(BUSH-GIBSON 2004)
To: areafiftyone
The paper declined to release specific figures for the finding, based on a survey of 339 relatives of 9/11 victims, explaining, "The study differs from a scientific survey in that the total population of living relatives of 9/11 victims is unknown and therefore could not be sampled precisely or randomly." History has been made, the slimes finally admits that their surveys are unscientific.
To: areafiftyone
YES!!!!!!!!
Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, I am soooo happy to hear this news!!!
I was affraid even they (the victims) did not get it!!
All the time during the investigation I was getting the impression (from the media of course) that the victims were placing the blame on the wrong administration. And then the report gave another pass to that sack of crap in a suit which ignored every terrorist attack against our country for 2 terms. Anyway, great news and surprising to see the source reporting it.
31 posted on
08/29/2004 8:40:32 AM PDT by
xander
To: areafiftyone
The NYT lies for the leftist DemocRAT Party so why would they print this news. It doesn't surprise me one bit that the families of the 9/11 victims blame Clinton. Clinton could have prevented 9/11 and he didn't.
33 posted on
08/29/2004 8:46:33 AM PDT by
teletech
(Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT!)
To: areafiftyone
.
"A New York Times poll of 9/11 victim families released
on Sunday shows that more Americans who lost relatives
in the worst terrorist attack in the nation's
history hold President Clinton responsible
rather than President Bush."
Click here to check out my web site dedicated to exposing Hillary.
34 posted on
08/29/2004 8:48:06 AM PDT by
christie
(http://www.hillaryforpresident-2008.com -- NOT!)
To: areafiftyone
I still can't get over the dem party actually having a 'truth squad'. Everyone knows that politics is the art of spin. Since their spin isn't working, they label it 'truth' in hopes that some shmoe will think 'it doesn't sound right, but they say it's true.'
Why didn't they come right out and title it the Ministry of Truth?
37 posted on
08/29/2004 8:53:34 AM PDT by
kenth
To: areafiftyone
8 months vs. 8 years. I know that the Average American is not the brightest bulb in the lot; but we are not that stupid.
As to why they would not release the results; it must have been overwhelmingly against Clinton.
The left is on suicide watch; Kerry imploding; now Clinton, the golden boy, is being found to be negligent during his tenure.
The truth is reaching the surface no matter how hard the MSM is trying to sweep it under the rug.
38 posted on
08/29/2004 9:09:12 AM PDT by
PigRigger
(Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
To: areafiftyone
To: areafiftyone
Sen. Clinton appeared on "This Week" in her role as chief of the Democratic Party's "Truth Squad."
That is just too funny. Hillary on a Truth Squad. Only in the mind of democrats.
42 posted on
08/29/2004 9:34:03 AM PDT by
jrushing
(Democrats=National Socialist Workers Party)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson