Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/29/2004 8:01:35 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: areafiftyone
Maybe they've read Richard Miniter's book, Losing Bin Laden.
2 posted on 08/29/2004 8:02:28 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

What fabulous news!!!


3 posted on 08/29/2004 8:03:07 AM PDT by Peach (The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Hey BILL!!! Here is your LEGACY!!!!! Bwahahahhahahahaha


4 posted on 08/29/2004 8:04:30 AM PDT by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
A New York Times poll of 9/11 victim families released on Sunday shows that more Americans who lost relatives in the worst terrorist attack in the nation's history hold President Clinton responsible rather than President Bush.


6 posted on 08/29/2004 8:05:27 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Hmmmmm would the NYT DARE to have an editorial on this tidbit?


8 posted on 08/29/2004 8:06:44 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
A New York Times poll of 9/11 victim families released on Sunday shows that more Americans who lost relatives in the worst terrorist attack in the nation's history hold President Clinton responsible rather than President Bush.

New York Times...hold President Clinton responsible..This has got to be a fake. Those seven words never appear in the same sentence...Impossible!

10 posted on 08/29/2004 8:08:26 AM PDT by Imaverygooddriver (I`m John Kerry and I approve this message: "I am a pinko punk azz")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
"The paper declined to release specific figures for the finding, based on a survey of 339 relatives of 9/11 victims, explaining, "The study differs from a scientific survey in that the total population of living relatives of 9/11 victims is unknown and therefore could not be sampled precisely or randomly.""

They’re not releasing it because it’s overwhelmingly detrimental to Democrats.

15 posted on 08/29/2004 8:11:09 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
The paper declined to release specific figures for the finding, based on a survey of 339 relatives of 9/11 victims, explaining, "The study differs from a scientific survey in that the total population of living relatives of 9/11 victims is unknown and therefore could not be sampled precisely or randomly."

Interestingly, the Times frequently publishes poll results on the national election with a few hundred or a thousand in the sample. I would say 339 is a valid sample to draw conclusions about the close-in relatives of the 2,800 9/11 victims.

16 posted on 08/29/2004 8:12:13 AM PDT by AC86UT89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Oh, dear! Hill will have to shut the 9/11 families up, big time.


17 posted on 08/29/2004 8:12:57 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Great news.

However, this morning FoxNews showed over 2700+ people (each representing one of the dead victims of 9/11) each ringing bells at the Ground Zero site.

They are protesting and blaming, who else? Bush. For his involvement and policies that led to the war, and 9/11.

I sure hope that this poll questioned more than the number of people involved in this stunt. I am not sure if they were family members. If they were, my condolences for them.

Anyone else see this?

20 posted on 08/29/2004 8:14:03 AM PDT by kstewskis (BUSH-GIBSON 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
The paper declined to release specific figures for the finding, based on a survey of 339 relatives of 9/11 victims, explaining, "The study differs from a scientific survey in that the total population of living relatives of 9/11 victims is unknown and therefore could not be sampled precisely or randomly."

I can't recall another instance in which the NY Times conducted a poll, published a general statement about the outcome, but REFUSED to release the specific numbers associated with the poll. It must have really been bad for Klinton.

21 posted on 08/29/2004 8:16:43 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Mrs. Clinton also claimed that the 9/11 Commission had praised her husband's handling of the 1999 Millennium threat as "exemplary," though the Commission actually attributes the foiling of the Millennium bomb plot to "luck" alone.

LMAO! What threat?

Another pathetic Klintoon lie? Or was I just having too much fun on that New Year's Eve?

22 posted on 08/29/2004 8:16:46 AM PDT by kstewskis (BUSH-GIBSON 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
The paper declined to release specific figures for the finding, based on a survey of 339 relatives of 9/11 victims, explaining, "The study differs from a scientific survey in that the total population of living relatives of 9/11 victims is unknown and therefore could not be sampled precisely or randomly."

History has been made, the slimes finally admits that their surveys are unscientific.

26 posted on 08/29/2004 8:25:03 AM PDT by AmericanCheeseFood (Zing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

YES!!!!!!!!

Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, I am soooo happy to hear this news!!!

I was affraid even they (the victims) did not get it!!

All the time during the investigation I was getting the impression (from the media of course) that the victims were placing the blame on the wrong administration. And then the report gave another pass to that sack of crap in a suit which ignored every terrorist attack against our country for 2 terms. Anyway, great news and surprising to see the source reporting it.


31 posted on 08/29/2004 8:40:32 AM PDT by xander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

The NYT lies for the leftist DemocRAT Party so why would they print this news. It doesn't surprise me one bit that the families of the 9/11 victims blame Clinton. Clinton could have prevented 9/11 and he didn't.


33 posted on 08/29/2004 8:46:33 AM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
.


"A New York Times poll of 9/11 victim families released
on Sunday shows that more Americans who lost relatives
in the worst terrorist attack in the nation's
history hold President Clinton responsible
rather than President Bush."



Click here to check out my web site dedicated to exposing Hillary.


34 posted on 08/29/2004 8:48:06 AM PDT by christie (http://www.hillaryforpresident-2008.com -- NOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I still can't get over the dem party actually having a 'truth squad'. Everyone knows that politics is the art of spin. Since their spin isn't working, they label it 'truth' in hopes that some shmoe will think 'it doesn't sound right, but they say it's true.'

Why didn't they come right out and title it the Ministry of Truth?


37 posted on 08/29/2004 8:53:34 AM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
8 months vs. 8 years. I know that the Average American is not the brightest bulb in the lot; but we are not that stupid.

As to why they would not release the results; it must have been overwhelmingly against Clinton.

The left is on suicide watch; Kerry imploding; now Clinton, the golden boy, is being found to be negligent during his tenure.

The truth is reaching the surface no matter how hard the MSM is trying to sweep it under the rug.
38 posted on 08/29/2004 9:09:12 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

BTTT


39 posted on 08/29/2004 9:09:54 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Sen. Clinton appeared on "This Week" in her role as chief of the Democratic Party's "Truth Squad."

That is just too funny. Hillary on a Truth Squad. Only in the mind of democrats.
42 posted on 08/29/2004 9:34:03 AM PDT by jrushing (Democrats=National Socialist Workers Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson