To: Mike Fieschko
Lehman was SecNav 1981 to 1987, I believe, and Kerry wasn't in the Senate until 1984. Correct--and the dates you yourself cited show that Lehman was SecNav while Kerry was a Senator. What is the dispute?
Unless all Senators are 'powerful Senators', a first term Senator ought not necessarily be called powerful.
Oh give me a break! There are only 100 of them in the entire United States! You do not believe a Senator, any Senator, can be classified by the term "powerful?" Being a "junior" Senator makes little difference in this case. Any Senator has enormous clout, power, and privilege.
To: SkyPilot
the dates you yourself cited show that Lehman was SecNav while Kerry was a Senator. What is the dispute?
I don't know when Lehman issued the replacement citation except that he issued it while SecNav, and Lehman was SecNav before and after Kerry became a Senator.
A minor point, perhaps, but we can't say that Lehman issued the replacement citation while Kerry was a Senator until we have a date on the replacement citation.
Oh give me a break! There are only 100 of them in the entire United States! You do not believe a Senator, any Senator, can be classified by the term "powerful?"
Whoa ... hold on.
The
original post. I was focusing on the adjective. Why add 'powerful'?
I thought you were implying something about Kerry and Lehman. I was mistaken, I apologize. You were implying something about getting a Navy underling.
243 posted on
08/28/2004 8:35:48 AM PDT by
Mike Fieschko
(Oh, and Dick Cheney, too.)
To: SkyPilot
Kerry also had Kennedy clout for a good 20 years before even stepping foot in DC.
382 posted on
08/28/2004 9:36:54 AM PDT by
mabelkitty
(Zealous Troll Hunter - and you know who you are - you've been warned.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson