1 posted on
08/27/2004 8:39:56 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: fourdeuce82d; Criminal Number 18F
2 posted on
08/27/2004 8:46:38 PM PDT by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
The Geneva rules were made before suicide psyco murderers were on earth. The rules were changed, forever on 9/11. Its time that the WORLD finally "GETS IT". No one tries to reason with a rabid dog.
To: neverdem
let me state upfront the NY Times reporters are clymers. Bigtime
That said, I hope some brass go to jail. In the navy if you are in charge of a ship, and if your ship runs into a reef, your career is over, even if you were sleeping off duty. The army needs to get a clue and buy a vowel.
5 posted on
08/27/2004 8:52:34 PM PDT by
Drango
(Pi$$ off France, Re-elect Bush)
To: neverdem
Classified parts of the 171-page report were provided to The New York Times by a senior Defense Department official who said fuller disclosure of the findings would help public understanding of the causes of the prisoner abuse scandal.
Why is ANYONE leaking classified material to the New York Slimes? That's the equivalent of giving classified information to the enemy.
Leak to the Wall Street Journal, if necessary. But the Slimes? No way.
To: neverdem
un friggin believable... BG Karpisski is conspicuous by her absence!!!
WHAT!!! she gets a PASS???
7 posted on
08/27/2004 9:02:13 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: neverdem
Classified parts of the 171-page report were provided to The New York Times by a senior Defense Department official who said fuller disclosure of the findings would help public understanding of the causes of the prisoner abuse scandal.If this official did leak classified information to the Times, he is a security risk and should be prosecuted.
8 posted on
08/27/2004 9:02:17 PM PDT by
Fedora
To: neverdem
I'd like to see that Army report for myself. The NYT is that last source I would trust for information on something like this.
9 posted on
08/27/2004 9:04:06 PM PDT by
Bonaparte
(the lyric said forevermore, forevermore's a memory...)
To: neverdem
But they were among those previously approved by the Pentagon for use in Afghanistan So what's not too "bad" for Jihadies in Afghanistan is "too bad" for the ones in Iraq. Why? Are they any less deadly or more civilized? Answer, no they have killed more American military than those rounded up in Afghanistan.
So why the double standard? Answer, the press got wind of it in Iraq... and there were pictures.
19 posted on
08/28/2004 10:01:56 PM PDT by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson