Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F-14s heading to aircraft graveyard
Stars and Stripes ^ | August 27, 2004 | Greg Tyler

Posted on 08/27/2004 2:25:34 PM PDT by swilhelm73

ONBOARD USS JOHN C. STENNIS, Sasebo, Japan — The U.S. Navy’s meanest, fastest and most agile fighter jet, nearing retirement, is deployed in the western Pacific Ocean for the last time.

The Grumman F-14, which entered military service in 1972, also is a movie star. At least for aviation aficionados, it upstaged actors including Tom Cruise in the film “Top Gun.”

Pilots flying the F-14s are from Fighter Squadron Three One, or VF-31, from Virginia Beach, Va. The VF-31 Tomcatters, also known as the “Felix the Cat” squadron, now are embarked on the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis.

The ship and squadron already have taken part in Summer Pulse ’04 and Rim of the Pacific ’04. They left Sasebo Wednesday for PASEX, an upcoming communications exercise with other nations in the region, said Stennis spokesman Lt. Corey Barker.

After this summer, the Tomcatters are to deploy once more from the U.S. East Coast, then head to the great aircraft retirement home in the desert, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Tucson, Ariz.

“It’s still the best fighter jet in the world,” said Lt. Andrew McLean, a VF-31 Tomcatter with three years’ experience at the F-14 controls. “It was built during the Cold War when the Soviet Union was our major military threat. It’s one of the last aircraft built intended to have overwhelming force, and they built these jets without cutting edges … the best engines were put in them, the best radar, the best missiles … It was designed for fleet defense, and did its job well,” the pilot said.

The squadron’s jets sport logos depicting Felix the Cat holding a bomb with a lit fuse. The unit has flown F-14s for 24 years, including the current version, the F-14D Super Tomcat.

Cmdr. Aaron Cudnohufsky, squadron commanding officer, said the Tomcat rightfully has become an American legend — and not just because of the film.

“I like to compare the F-14 to a Harley-Davidson,” Cudnohufsky said. “There are a lot of airplanes out there. But none have the beauty and grace of the Tomcat. Every time I am in the aircraft, I am in awe. It looks fast just sitting there.”

The Tomcatters’ command master chief, Master Chief Petty Officer Tom Gall, called being part of a Tomcat squadron an honor. Even after 25 years in the Navy, he said, the plane’s aesthetics still leave him awestruck.

“The Tomcat just looks sharp,” Gall said. “It’s mesmerizing to watch it fly. Especially as it sweeps its wings back and goes in for the kill. I’m quite certain that many people will miss it when it is gone.”

Throughout its long career, the F-14 has performed many different missions, Gall said, making it “a true workhorse of naval aviation ... air supremacy, or ‘dog fighting,’ to reconnaissance and putting bombs on target.”

The Navy has moved to the F/A-18 Super Hornet, more a multipurpose jet praised for its versatility, rather than the F-14’s pure speed and maneuverability in a dogfight.

“Today, we’re all seeking to do more with less, so with the new jets, there are some compromises,” said McLean, whose pilot call sign is “Lick.” “They are still great, but the F-14s were built as fighters and they were the best fighters.”

The pilot said eventually VF-31 would transform into a squadron of F/A-18s, airplanes he’s had the opportunity to fly.

The F-14, he said, “is more like what you think of as a muscle car ... they have this sort of aura about them ... the F-14s are like that.”

“With the Super Hornets, you kind of get that ‘new car smell,’ like with a new Mercedes. It’s got power, but not overwhelming power, and has a lot of the luxury items and amenities,” he added.

“And the F-14s, being older, tend to take more maintenance. You’ll have Super Hornet guys working 9-to-5 shifts, when our guys are regularly working 12-hour shifts and longer just to keep the Tomcats working at top level,” he said. “But when both planes are up and running at the top of their game, there’s a lot of things the Super Hornet just can’t replace that the Tomcat can do.”

McLean said many lessons learned flying the F-14s “I’ll be able to take with me when I begin flying the Super Hornet.”

Having worked almost exclusively on the F-14s for 16 years, Chief Petty Officer Scott Hadley, an aviation structural mechanic, said he believes retiring the storied jets, even if they’re showing their age, is “the worst thing they could do in naval aviation. Absolutely.”

From the Tomcatters’ Ready Room aboard the Stennis, he said, “There’s nothing out there that can match it right now as far as capability … plus, it’s truly a gorgeous aircraft.”

But Hadley also admitted the jets are aging. “They’re getting crippled, and it’s hard to get parts.”

Still, the F-14D Super Tomcats that the squadron’s pilots fly go faster than Mach 2. They’re still the fastest fighter jet on the carrier.

“A Super Hornet can’t even get close to us,” Hadley said. “Not only is it effective, it’s just gorgeous; it’s artwork. So we carry that pride.”


TOPICS: Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: f14; tomcats; usn; ussjohncstennis; virginiabeach
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-165 next last
To: Bombardier
The fighter immortals:

P-51 "Mustang" (Best ever, in my opinion)

IMHO, the most beautiful airplane ever designed, escpecially the P-51D.

Mark

61 posted on 08/27/2004 4:01:44 PM PDT by MarkL (Dude!!! You're farting fire!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Snardius
I don't know Cunningham so will not ask him.

I would bet that both the F-14 and F-15 have better records than the phantom.

I grew up near Eglin and remember seeing them many times. One could usually see the smoke before the planes.

62 posted on 08/27/2004 4:01:56 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
By "them" I meant the Phontoms.

You will have to admit they really did smoke.

63 posted on 08/27/2004 4:03:13 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
I guess today is not my day.

Of course I know how to spell Phantom.

64 posted on 08/27/2004 4:04:10 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Snardius
The best jet fighter known to man.

Hey, my late Uncle helped design the F-4 Phantom! He LOVED that plane and it was his favorite, until he worked on the F-15!

Mark

65 posted on 08/27/2004 4:04:44 PM PDT by MarkL (Dude!!! You're farting fire!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
If we are talking about beauty, it's got to go to the bombers:

In this order,

XB-70
B-1B
B-58

Navy fighters are designed to be so ugly, that they are beautiful anyway. The F-4 was mean death from all angles, only surpassed by the "I'm gonna kick your ass" look of the Tomcat.

66 posted on 08/27/2004 4:04:49 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Hint: It took a Demon to get a Phantom. It takes a Hornet to get a ???????

Mud Dauber? (A10)
Black Widow? (F23)
Bumble Bee? (P56)

67 posted on 08/27/2004 4:05:39 PM PDT by hattend (I'm on the Mark Steyn Ping List! I'm somebody!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
Don't need the Phoenix System anymore. Handling six targets simultaneously was a an answer to a Soviet threat

The last part of your statement is true; the first is questionable. While the Soviet Union may no longer exist as a threat, those same bombers and standoff cruise missiles (i.e., AS-4, AS-6, etc) are owned by the communist chinese, and still pose a threat to our carrier groups deployed in westpac, one that AMRAAM equipped F/A-18s are ill-suited to nullify.

Our carrier groups look impressive these days, but the next war will show them to be paper tigers because of insufficent emphasis on the outer air zone (not to mention insufficent ASW, although fortunately the Chinese submarine fleet is still below-par).

68 posted on 08/27/2004 4:06:15 PM PDT by Technogeeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet
Not only is the F-14 a great fighter, Tomcat is the coolest name ever given to a plane.

The Tomcat was not named for a 'cat', like the other Grumman fighters, but for Adm. Tom Connelly, who saved the Navy from the F-111.

69 posted on 08/27/2004 4:07:28 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hattend
P-56 ...kind of Bumble Bee-like


70 posted on 08/27/2004 4:10:31 PM PDT by hattend (I'm on the Mark Steyn Ping List! I'm somebody!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Snardius

*shrug* At least it doesn't sweat...


71 posted on 08/27/2004 4:12:48 PM PDT by null and void (Kerry can't cut the mustard...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Severa
For anyone who will be in our neck of the woods (VA Beach) this year's NAS Oceana Air Show will be Sept 24-26th.

This post has nothing to do with anything, but something I always wondered was why there was ever a NAS Olathe (Kansas). I mean, Oceana is a great name for a Naval Air Station, and from the name, you can guess that it's located somewhere near water... On the other hand, NAS Olathe is (or was... the area is now considdered "the suburbs!" In fact there was a NIKE missile site located there as well) surrounded by farmland!

I mean, who the hell came up with the idea of putting a "Naval Air Station" in the middle of Kansas?! Ok, eastern Kansas, but you get the idea! Who makes these decisions? It's like the "Swiss Navy!"

Mark

/sarcasm

72 posted on 08/27/2004 4:17:58 PM PDT by MarkL (Dude!!! You're farting fire!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Didn't ADM Connely lose his job over that? I seem to recall reading that somewheres.


73 posted on 08/27/2004 4:20:52 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
In fact, replace the F-14 with unmanned fighters and you can accomplish the same mission with less angst for the pilot since there is none. An aircraft carrier equipped in this manner could sortie with a hundred unmanned fighters which would protect the fleet and sweep the skies.

I'm really not up on the technology, but I've wondered alot lately about ECM and jammers to keep UA from being used... Wouldn't that be some sort of a problem?

Mark

74 posted on 08/27/2004 4:23:07 PM PDT by MarkL (Dude!!! You're farting fire!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
I can't wait to see what the Navy comes up with after the JSF goes Tango Uniform.

BTW, there's still a LOT of people in the Navy that think that thing's actually going to get built. Lots here, too, if the posts I read are any indication.

You seen any designs you can talk about?

This "unmanned aircraft/radio-controlled model" fetish will have to wear out, too.

75 posted on 08/27/2004 4:25:11 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

The TomCat was a long time fixture here in San Diego.
Last night a Hornet landing here at North Island
could not stop and went into the harbor. Pilot OK.
They are getting ready to pick the jet out of the drink.


76 posted on 08/27/2004 4:25:33 PM PDT by SoCalPol (FLUSH THE JOHNS '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thumperusn; cjk; Poohbah; hchutch; Travis McGee; Pukin Dog; Jet Jaguar; Old Sarge; GATOR NAVY; ...

PING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


77 posted on 08/27/2004 4:28:30 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

bump


78 posted on 08/27/2004 4:30:14 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
Yeah, Connelly got canned, but he gained immortality.
79 posted on 08/27/2004 4:30:25 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

These really the best????


80 posted on 08/27/2004 4:39:30 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson