Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABORTION BAN ILLEGAL, JUDGE RULES (CLINTON APPOINTEE)
Miami Herald ^ | Aug. 27, 2004 | Larry Neimeister (AP)

Posted on 08/27/2004 1:33:08 PM PDT by JesseHousman

U.S. District Judge Richard Casey became the second federal judge to call the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act unconstitutional.

NEW YORK - A federal judge declared the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act unconstitutional Thursday in the second such ruling in three months -- even though he called the procedure ``gruesome, brutal, barbaric and uncivilized.''

U.S. District Judge Richard Casey -- one of three federal judges across the country to hear simultaneous challenges to the law earlier this year -- faulted the ban for not containing an exception to protect a woman's health, something the Supreme Court has made clear is required in laws prohibiting particular types of abortion.

The law, signed in November, banned a procedure known to doctors as intact dilation and extraction and called partial-birth abortion by abortion foes. The fetus is partially removed from the womb, and the skull is punctured or crushed.

Louise Melling, director of the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, said her group was thrilled by the ruling: ``We can only hope as we have decision after decision after decision striking these bans, saying they endanger women's health, that the legislatures will finally stop.''

On June 1, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in San Francisco also found the law unconstitutional, saying it violates a woman's right to choose an abortion. A judge in Lincoln, Neb., has yet to rule. The three judges suspended the ban while they held the trials.

The three verdicts are almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

''We are in the process of the appeal of these issues now, which tells you exactly what we're doing and where we're going,'' Attorney General John Ashcroft said Thursday.

The ban, which President Clinton twice vetoed, was seen by abortion rights activists as a fundamental departure from the Supreme Court's Roe vs. Wade. But the Bush administration has argued that the procedure is cruel and unnecessary and causes pain to the fetus.

At trials earlier this year, doctors testified that of 1.3 million abortions performed annually, the law would affect about 130,000. Some observers suggest the number would be much lower -- 2,200 to 5,000.

In his ruling, Casey said that there is evidence that the procedure can have safety advantages for women. He said the Supreme Court had made it clear that ``this gruesome procedure may be outlawed only if there exists a medical consensus that there is no circumstance in which any women could potentially benefit from it.''

At another point, Casey wrote that testimony put before himself and Congress showed the outlawed abortion technique to be a ``gruesome, brutal, barbaric and uncivilized medical procedure.''

Casey, who was appointed to the bench by Clinton in 1997, was considered by some observers to be the best legal hope for the law's supporters.

''The judge was very aggressive in his questioning and very transparent in his articulation of his personal views on the matter,'' said Gloria Feldt, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. ``Fortunately, he chose to uphold the law.''


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; clintonistas; federalcourts; partialbirth; pbaban2003
-- faulted the ban for not containing an exception to protect a woman's health

Louise Melling, director of the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, said her group was thrilled by the ruling...

District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in San Francisco...

Casey, who was appointed to the bench by Clinton sco also found the law unconstitutional...

This says it all:ACLU, Clinton Judges (regardless of their weak statements of disagreement)are gleefully happy that this nation has become one of "saving whales and turtles," but to hell with innocent babies!

1 posted on 08/27/2004 1:33:10 PM PDT by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman

Please tell me where God is when it is legal to stab a baby in the head with scissors while it is kicking and fighting to survive, but illegal to step foot in the sacred territory of the ...turtle or rat or whatever else it is they are saving this week.
The ACLU will not be satisfied until children and Christians are the endangered species.
God help us all and forgive this world for what it is becoming.


2 posted on 08/27/2004 1:37:36 PM PDT by msp2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: JesseHousman
Tape those color printouts on those back car windows, everyone. The MSM, the John Kerry's, and selfish people in general have NO INTEREST in bringing Americans face-to-face with the hard truth.

We should all do this on days like today. This is a good place to find brutally honest depiction of the bitter fruit of late-term abortion.

5 posted on 08/27/2004 1:41:19 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman

"SAVE THE BABY WHALES!"

6 posted on 08/27/2004 2:05:18 PM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Pro-abortionists delight in scenes like this. Here's a child who had his brain removed by a "skillful" doctor.

7 posted on 08/27/2004 5:26:50 PM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson