Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HERE WE GO AGAIN WITH THIS "LIVING IN POVERTY" NONSENSE
Neal Nuze ^ | 8/27/04 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 08/27/2004 9:27:18 AM PDT by NotchJohnson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last
To: Sybeck1
We have poor children because poor people have sex.

Yes, don't have children if you cannot afford them.

101 posted on 09/01/2004 5:47:36 AM PDT by petercooper (Kerry passes up terror briefing: "They have offered to brief me. I just haven't had time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

To: ftlpdx

Live within your means. Save what you can. Improve yourself and your situation as you can. Plan for the future.

Very few people in poverty, or on minimum wage, remain there for more than 10 years. And very few who retire do so out of inability to work.

Remember, the conventional retirement age of 65 was chosen at a time when very few people lived that long. Our current convention of retiring at 65 is a luxury in the history of mankind.

The solution to the problem - if it is a problem instead of a demand for luxury - is _not_ to demand others pay under threat of imprisonment.


103 posted on 09/02/2004 3:24:25 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson