Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: technomage

I thought Yang was also wrongly NOT docked two tenths for having too many holds?


5 posted on 08/27/2004 7:21:46 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hopespringseternal

That's what Tim Daggett pointed out during the apparatus finals.


8 posted on 08/27/2004 7:23:21 AM PDT by JacksonCalhoun (Bruce - you have always sucked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal
I thought Yang was also wrongly NOT docked two tenths for having too many holds?

What you say is true, but if the IOC admits that then they have no ground for the opportunistic USA bashing they just love so much.

17 posted on 08/27/2004 7:25:12 AM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal

Yeah, I saw that too, so why NOW are they STILL trying to say Hamm didn't get the Gold, let's see... give the Korean the .1 he should NOT have lost and take away the .2 he should have... looks like the KOREAN should give back HIS BRONZE to me!


23 posted on 08/27/2004 7:27:23 AM PDT by KenD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal

The outcome of judged events like gymnastics will always be subjective. As Hamm has pointed out, if the slo-mo tapes were examined for every gymnast that competed for that medal, every gymnast's standing would be changed. Judges are human and they make mistakes, but that is the nature of the sport and, IMHO, what makes it so interesting.


24 posted on 08/27/2004 7:27:52 AM PDT by cwiz24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal; AppyPappy
There are two issues here -

1. An initial error by the judges who gave the Korean's routine a 9.9 start value instead of a 10. Under that circumstance the Korean got the bronze and Paul Hamm got the gold.

2. Reviewing the Korean's routine revealed that he performed 4 holds instead of the allowable 3 per routine. The deduction for this is .2. If the judges correctly taken this deduction Paul Hamm still wins and the Korean is out of the medals.

Either way the rightful winner of the gold medal is Paul Hamm - USA - and he should just smile and be gracious as he has throughout this ordeal caused solely by judge's errors.

33 posted on 08/27/2004 7:31:21 AM PDT by pbear8 (Swifties plus POWs = Senator Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal; federal
Right. And that leaves Paul Hamm in the clear as far as the IOC is concerned, which, I'm sure, is why they've backed off. They're all focusing on the 1/10 and ignoring the 2/10 deduction. He should keep it. And the Koreans were initially outraged, because the lowered scoring start point kept him out of the gold, until the tape was reviewed and then the glaring 2/10's deduction fault by the Korean became obvious. They should all give it a rest and let Paul enjoy his gold. There's no shame in silver, either. The Korean looked great and should be proud, but I know some countries put an awful lot of emphasis on gold only and are also jealous that the US is cleaning up in the medals standings.

What you say is true, but if the IOC admits that then they have no ground for the opportunistic USA bashing they just love so much.

And then what would they do for fun? The booing directed toward Paul and the US indirectly was just shameful. But so many love to bash the US and believe, despite the EU Olympic site and EU judges and EU IOC committees, that they are biased toward the US that it will be hard to convince them otherwise. No point in trying, the math prevails here.

54 posted on 08/27/2004 7:49:51 AM PDT by fortunecookie (My grandparents didn't flee communism so that I could live in Kerry's Kommune.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal

THAT IS CORRECT!! The judges MESSED UP on his parallel bar routine and SHOULD have deducted 0.2...so kiss off IOC!!


56 posted on 08/27/2004 7:55:51 AM PDT by GRRRRR (Love America? VOTE REPUBLICAN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal
I thought Yang was also wrongly NOT docked two tenths for having too many holds?

Exactly right.

77 posted on 08/27/2004 8:10:15 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal
I thought Yang was also wrongly NOT docked two tenths for having too many holds?

They kinda left that part out of the story. You are correct, so why is this still an issue. IMO because Hamm in American, one of the evil ones. (sick)

87 posted on 08/27/2004 8:20:32 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal
I thought Yang was also wrongly NOT docked two tenths for having too many holds?

And with that .2 deduction Yang would have finished 4th, out of the medals altogether.

94 posted on 08/27/2004 8:31:29 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal

Yes, that was my understanding as well, The Korean was imporoperly not docted a 10th for his 4th, and improper hold, but when the scores were certified the total score or something was incorrect and so he was doced a 10th from the scores that appeared on the board by an error.

So they missed doccing him a 10th for his 4th hold position, but he did lose a 10th from score because of an error in addition.... sounds to me like a wash.


104 posted on 08/27/2004 8:39:44 AM PDT by HamiltonJay ("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal

"I thought Yang was also wrongly NOT docked two tenths for having too many holds?"

That's what I heard, too.


114 posted on 08/27/2004 8:53:54 AM PDT by keats5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson