Posted on 08/27/2004 6:21:28 AM PDT by Theodore R.
Whites no longer the majority in Texas Associated Press
White non-Hispanics are no longer the majority in Texas for the first time since the 1800s, according to a Census Bureau survey released today.
The survey said whites stopped being the majority as of last year. The bureau also released statistics that showed Texas joined only Illinois and North Carolina in having a poverty rate that measurably increased while income decreased in 2002-03.
State demographer Steve Murdock said the two trends are related as economic woes have slowed white migration from other states. Most of Texas' population expansion since 2000 has come from births and international immigration, both sources of predominantly Hispanic growth.
"A variety of historical and discriminatory factors mean (Hispanics) have lower incomes," Murdock said.
Texas was dominated by Indians and a few Spanish settlers until 1821, when the new Mexican government allowed Americans to enter as long as they pledged allegiance, turned Catholic and learned Spanish.
Soon the flood of white newcomers quickly made Texas look like other U.S. frontier areas, and dictator Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna's attempt to tighten Mexican control resulted in a successful Texas revolution in 1836. By the time Texas became a state in 1845, whites dominated the landscape.
That ended some time in 2003, according to estimates from the annual population measurement known as the American Community Survey.
Estimates show Texas was 49.5 percent white in 2003, down 1.5 percentage points from 2002 but still a large plurality. Almost all the loss was made up by Hispanics, who made up about 35.3 percent of the populace.
"The future of Latinos is the future of Texas, as the population numbers show," said Luis Figueroa, legislative staff attorney for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund.
The black population remained basically flat at around 10.8 percent. Asian-Americans now accounted for about 3 percent of Texas.
The dip of whites below the 50 percent mark was inevitable, although its occurrence in 2003 was at the early end of the predicted scale, Murdock said.
"We thought it probably would happen this year or next, so it's only a year different," Murdock said. "It does indicate that Hispanic growth is occurring more rapidly than we anticipated it would."
Murdock said Texas' continued explosion in Hispanic growth, fueled largely by international immigration that made up 36 percent of the state's growth from April 2000 to July 2003, helps explain the socio-economic numbers.
Most states did not report a significant change in income or poverty from 2001-02 to 2002-03, according to the Census Bureau. Not Texas, which had an estimated 3.8 percent decline in median household income to about $41,000 along with a 1 percent hike in the poverty rate.
The Census Bureau's definition of poverty varies by the size of the household.
There was little change in the percentage of Texans without health insurance, which was basically flat at 24.7 percent. But with nearly a quarter of its residents uninsured, Texas still easily leads the nation in that unwanted statistic.
Figueroa pointed to a recent report that immigrant teens with sterling academic records are having trouble getting into college because of a lack of citizenship.
"If you keep putting up barriers to obtaining success, a lot of times the result is going to be a cycle of no insurance and lower incomes," he said from his San Antonio office.
Not all the numbers paint such a grim socio-economic picture for Texas. The percentage of Texans at least 25 years old with a high school diploma grew slightly to 77.8 percent while those with college degrees was flat at 24.5 percent.
However, the rate of Texas adults who didn't even make it to high school also rose slightly, to 10.8 percent.
OK, so next logical question.. What are my entitlements as a white dude. Gimme, gimme, gimme.
Finally! I get to bitch about the Man keeping me down. /s
Is this tallying only legal residents and citizens, or is this also including the illegals?
And gov't employees, in the form of census takers, are identifying people breaking our immigration law, why are they not being deported?
Aren't latino-americans "white?"
I do not know for sure.
I live in W NC where the migrants are rampant, WE need the government to close the borders, NOW...
I doubt they are counting illegals. We just moved out of TX by choice. Overcrowded schools, high taxes, crime, high insurance, etc. Illegals are a big part of those problems.
ANYBODY??
If the borders were sealed, this same demographic change would have happened...it just happened faster due to the porous barrier that is our southern border.
You mean you found a state without any of those problems?
Buried in the article is the fact that this is largely due to the invasion of illegal alien parasites.
Deport their sorry butts AND their anchor babies. Now !
"Finally! I get to bitch about the "HOMBRE" keeping me down. /s "
texas is 10 years behind kalli-fornica...
Maybe I can get some of those minority contracts now.
"I doubt they are counting illegals."
The writer refers to "international immigration" as 36% of the growth.
Not so fast:
"A variety of historical and discriminatory factors mean (Hispanics) have lower incomes," Murdock said.
DOES anyone doubt that TEXAS will try to secede from the union in oh about twenty years.
Yeah, I doubt it and think it is a silly/backward statement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.