"If I understand this correctly, I must say that I am 100% opposed to this standardization. I would prefer that the states run their own business and allow me to chose which state is more deserving of my residence."
You really make your residence decision on whether or not a certain state exempts certain types of products from its sales tax? If so, that is very unusual. States would still have the flexibility to set rates as they desire. They can even refuse to standardize as they see fit. However, it is to everyone's benefit that the myriad of differing sales tax rules by simplified.
However, like in most areas, the FairTax does not require standardization, just encourages it.
My state of residence is not based entirely on their tax structure, but it is a major contribution to the cost of living considerations when I am offered an opportunity to relocate. In addition, if I lived in California, I would love the opportunity to have escaped the imposed slavery the dems brought the residents.
Thanks for the clarification as to it being an encouragement, not a requirement. Now, is that encouragement the same style as the "encouraged" max speed limits or seat belt laws or BAC%?