Bull. In #19, you implicitly accuse the Bush campaign of infringing copyrights. In #20, someone asks you to clarify. In #21, you then make the implicit accusation explict, by saying that it is the whole point of the article.
That accusation is wrong, because no one has claimed the Bush campaign of using copyrighted material. It is only the usage of the "Olympics" trademark that is in question in the article.