To: Blood of Tyrants
How much do you add to an LAT poll to get the real numbers--8 or 9 percent?
2 posted on
08/25/2004 8:03:58 PM PDT by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: randog
It must have killed Ron Brownstein to write these words.
6 posted on
08/25/2004 8:05:49 PM PDT by
TheExploited
(R-Illinois)
To: randog
Well they had Arnie at 25 before the election when the final vote total showed him coming in at 48%. I would say about ....... that much Kentucky windage. Note they say Kerry has been leading in their poll all year. But that was all before the little swiftie duck took to the field and decided to take on the SS Kerry.
They spend $65 million and get blown up by $300k. Sounds about right.
Fire III.
21 posted on
08/25/2004 8:15:34 PM PDT by
snooker
To: randog
Nah, they're simply not as far off as they usually are... LA Times would rather argue its a "dirty campaign" bounce than a convention bounce.
The decoder key to LA Times polls are their partisan sampling... This one shows a decent comparison of Republicans to Demonrats.
30 posted on
08/25/2004 8:18:20 PM PDT by
dangus
To: randog
..........just do the math {x} Bustamante factor.....in English that is add 15% to any LA SLIMES POLL!
To: randog
How much do you add to an LAT poll to get the real numbers--8 or 9 percent? Yea, and you have to love the Times, using terms like "edge" to describe the Bush lead and "nick" to describe the Kerry collapse.
They sure didn't print this article with any "bias". LOL!
To: randog
Just what I was thinking. LATimes skews the numbers, so we can add another ten or twelve points Kerry's being buried under. Calling Hillary!!!! Help!!!
204 posted on
08/28/2004 7:54:13 AM PDT by
hershey
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson