Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
The point dude, is that Bush has actually never been losing to Kerry nationally in any poll done on likely voters. The media just doesn't report it.
150 posted on 08/25/2004 7:59:23 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Pukin Dog

OK, I get your point and I agree. A properly conducted poll should have shown GW ahead by 5-10 points all along. In the absence of media bias, that would have been 10-15 points. I can go with that.


163 posted on 08/25/2004 8:07:55 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog

Well said. And early in 2005, after George W. Bush is reelected by a margin of at least ten per cent, (': there will be a flurry of books about how Bush conducted a smear campaign that cost America a visionary leader. And later in 2005, the same flurry of books will be on the remainder table in about equal quantity (other than those in garage sales).


230 posted on 08/25/2004 9:35:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson