Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joan

I have consistently criticized UN peacekeepers as mere "witnesses" to slaughter, who would not act to save anyone without explicit orders, and maybe not then. Their record in Congo, Rwanda, and Bosnia doesn't speak well of them. Their usual practice is to hide until the fighting is over, and only then come out to count the bodies.

It is heartening to read that, on that day and in that place, those Canadians had the grit to act, even against orders, to save lives who were counting on them.


4 posted on 08/25/2004 3:43:05 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marron
But if the UN didn't go there in the first place to disarm the Serbs, they would have had a fighting chance.

And in Rwanda, the UN left promptly after the Tutsis had all crowded into schools, hospitals, etc. where the UN was based, the Hutus knew exactly where to get at the Tutsis once the UN departed. There were Tutsis BEGGING the departing UN soldiers to shoot them because they preferred that over being slaughtered by machetes - the main killing tool of the Hutus. The UN wouldn't even take a pleaing woman with them on their truck - but all the pet dogs of foreigners departing were shipped out. The UN makes these massacres EASIER. The massacres and the wars happen AFTER the UN has been established in these places.

5 posted on 08/25/2004 3:49:32 PM PDT by joan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: marron

Sounds like the Canadians I've known.


40 posted on 08/28/2004 3:25:33 AM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson