Replies

Yeah. I was afraid you'd do that! It's a good point, but it does not answer the editor's request. You claimed that Kerry was silencing vets. (You're correct.) You sent a response that Kerry impugned his fellow vets. (also true.)

But the TWO ARE NOT THE SAME ISSUE!

The editor now gets to think he's right, and dealing with a buncha incoherent nincompoops.

The answer to the editor's question is (should be) related to the FEC complaint demanding SwiftVets remove their ads recently. This has nothing to do with the Kerry 71 testimony!

Which is why the editor was put off by your cartoon....it's not internally coherent....close....but no cigar!!! (It is nice graphics, I'll certainly give you that.)

Again, this is NOT censorship....frankly....in this particular case...it's good editing.....hate to admit it.