I don't send him every one I do. Due to the reasons you state... volume, and such. Regarding printing out and snail mailing... you don't understand digital art, the current state of the industry and what's required. I do. When the London Sunday Telegraph requested my work, trust me... they had to have it sent by email. Not because they are overseas, but because of the need for printing 'crispness'. It also saves them precious time from having to scan it, photo color correct it, etc, etc.
Ah. I didn't know that. Thanks for the clarification.
Regarding printing out and snail mailing... you don't understand digital art, the current state of the industry and what's required.
Nonsense. I've been working in digital art since the early 1990s. I also own two state-of-the-art printers and know full well what their capabilities are in terms of printing out digital art.
When the London Sunday Telegraph requested my work, trust me... they had to have it sent by email.
Yes, I understand that. I've had my works published elsewhere as well. (By the way, I am duly impressed that your work has been featured overseas. Good show!)
My point remains that what's going on here isn't censorship. As another poster pointed out, only the government can censor. Every other avenue of publication is perfectly at liberty to refuse any (and even all) submissions if they so choose...however, they do so at the mercy of the American consumer.