Your comment is an excellent illustration of why evos keep losing the argument.
Indeed... atheism is on the decline, and with it, Darwinism.
If you don't believe in radiometric dating, mass spectrometry, x-ray crystallography or any of the other disciplines that measure the natural world, then how can you believe in DNA? It's undetectable without these tools.
It's the same when creationists use Piltdown man to argue against evolution. Creationists don't believe in any of the methods that were used to determine that Piltdown was fake.
You can't have it both ways.